Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options)

On 18/01/2018 16:44, John Foliot wrote:
> -1 to both, with a note that +1's Joshue's comment.
> 
> One advantage of the aggressive publishing cycle being imposed by the 
> W3C (aka roughly every 18 months +/-) means that we can shelve this for 
> 2.1, and continue working on it in 2.2 - we've broken the 
> "all-or-nothing" update approach. If it isn't ready now, it isn't ready 
> now, and that's OK (well, at least understandable), we can continue to 
> keep working on it.  Meanwhile, regulators and legislators can use 
> whichever version they choose to point to, and/or develop legislative 
> language that stays in step with the rapid advances that technology imposes.

I look forward to another 18 months of discussing target size, now for 
2.2...

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Thursday, 18 January 2018 19:04:15 UTC