- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:03:52 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 18/01/2018 16:44, John Foliot wrote: > -1 to both, with a note that +1's Joshue's comment. > > One advantage of the aggressive publishing cycle being imposed by the > W3C (aka roughly every 18 months +/-) means that we can shelve this for > 2.1, and continue working on it in 2.2 - we've broken the > "all-or-nothing" update approach. If it isn't ready now, it isn't ready > now, and that's OK (well, at least understandable), we can continue to > keep working on it. Meanwhile, regulators and legislators can use > whichever version they choose to point to, and/or develop legislative > language that stays in step with the rapid advances that technology imposes. I look forward to another 18 months of discussing target size, now for 2.2... P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2018 19:04:15 UTC