Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses

Hi Andrew there are a two other differences between version 1 and 2 in the
survey besides internal/external references.

   1. The first uses "user-specific inputs" the 2nd uses "user interface
   components"
   2. the first uses "meaning" and the second uses "purposes"

If we start to rally around one of those I can make these things match and
have just the internal vs external reference be the issue.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> Call For Consensus — ends Friday January 19th at 10:00pm Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed responses to issues on the Identify Common
> Purpose SC and discussed the SC at length. There are a few possible options
> on the table. This CFC is being conducted via a survey due to the
> complexity.
>
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/CFC_Id_common_controls/
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>