- From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:16:28 -0500
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKdCpxxZvDoJC9XRkNqbZpNA0rTzqH1nbdCu6UbXP4kpCt9AYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Just to muddy the already sluggish waters more... For #1, since we're now scoping this to autofill and form inputs, I'd suggest that "user-specific inputs" is the better choice. For #2, I prefer "meaning" over "purpose" by a hair. In many ways, "role" could also be considered an appropriate term here, except that "role" is already a reserved term with a special meaning, and attempting to apply it here would introduce more issues than it's worth battling down IMHO. With regard to form inputs, we could also contemplate "intent", but it's Thursday afternoon, and we need to be finalized in roughly 24 hours, so as long as we can expand and explain sufficiently in the Understanding document, then I am less fussed over which term we use in the actual SC language. Meanwhile, off to complete the survey now... JF On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:28 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote: > Hi Andrew there are a two other differences between version 1 and 2 in the > survey besides internal/external references. > > 1. The first uses "user-specific inputs" the 2nd uses "user interface > components" > 2. the first uses "meaning" and the second uses "purposes" > > If we start to rally around one of those I can make these things match and > have just the internal vs external reference be the issue. > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902> > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > * Including those with disabilities* > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> > wrote: > >> Call For Consensus — ends Friday January 19th at 10:00pm Boston time. >> >> >> >> The Working Group has discussed responses to issues on the Identify >> Common Purpose SC and discussed the SC at length. There are a few possible >> options on the table. This CFC is being conducted via a survey due to the >> complexity. >> >> >> >> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/CFC_Id_common_controls/ >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> AWK >> >> >> >> Andrew Kirkpatrick >> >> Group Product Manager, Accessibility >> >> Adobe >> >> >> >> akirkpat@adobe.com >> >> http://twitter.com/awkawk >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- John Foliot Principal Accessibility Strategist Deque Systems Inc. john.foliot@deque.com Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2018 19:16:51 UTC