Re: Updates to Respond to Motion Actuation comments

I'm fine with all the responses...

in 621 there seems to be a small typo

"and the oder moving the device (shaking, titling, panning) and can
therefore be treated in one SC"

Not sure what "oder" means, a river in Europe is what Wiki says ... "user"?

In 676, there is a sentence "For example, a user might use a head mouse
system that operates using the camera in order to interface with the
pointer/mouse interface would be exempted. "
 Seems like something is off in it.

I also had a red flag using accessibility supported... but I can live with
it in the edited version.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> OK, Detlev worked on the 620/621 issue responses and Steve and I met and
> worked on the response to the other (676) issue.
>
>
>
> The issue responses:
>
> 620: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#620
>
> 621: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#621
>
> 676: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#676
>
>
>
> Pull request with changes:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/681 (changes to the SC. We modified
> the first bullet and also addressed another issue that was raised about
> subject/verb agreement)
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/679 (understanding changes so far)
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>