Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631

​hmmm .... what about "default" as the other dimension... that was another
solution that was bouncing around the meeting.​


Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:56 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:

> On 10/01/2018 21:09, David MacDonald wrote:
>
>> I think the idea is that although it could be abused, it is not likely
>> that the height (in horizontal languages) will be less than the default or
>> the height required by all users of the content.
>>
>
> That's a broad assumption, and I'm uncomfortable having a normative set of
> requirements that can be satisfied while still not meeting the actual
> intent (because if we're assuming that the one dimension will be the right
> one "required by all users of the content", we may as well also just assume
> that the other dimension will also be the right one, and obviate the SC
> altogether).
>
> -1 for just specifying a single dimension.
>
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>