- From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 10:17:58 -0600
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKdCpxzmQEhnhhqi+MDiEsaY1f+9NoqoP-8gPTBdZ7Pob7ifkw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Andrew, That would work as well. I just don't want to see two controls numbered XXX001, or XXX002, etc., so either we change the numbering as I suggested, or continue with the numbers as you suggested: either achieves the same goal. JF On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: > John, > > I don’t really care about the form, and believe that the specifics are > non-critical. Would you prefer to have the second list just continue where > the last one leaves off (eg, one list ends with CP021 and the next starts > with CP022)? > > > > Thanks, > > AWK > > > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > > Group Product Manager, Accessibility > > Adobe > > > > akirkpat@adobe.com > > http://twitter.com/awkawk > > > > *From: *John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, January 3, 2018 at 10:14 > *To: *David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> > *Cc: *Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > While I generally support the addition of an identifier (number) to each > Common Control, I do not believe we agreed to both CP00x for controls, and > ICP00x for inputs. I have a general concern about the introduction of two > controls that are numbered 001 (even if/when a prefixed alpa-string is > added). > > > > As such I OBJECT to the current notation, but not to the larger idea of > adding the identifier. > > > > My preference would be to instead (if we really MUST differentiate between > the two types of controls), we use a numbering scheme like this: > > > > > *7.1 Common Control Purposes * > The following items represent an intended destination or action. > > CP001 > > Table of Contents - View or go to a table of contents > > CP002 > > Next - View or go to the next item in a series (e.g. a page in a book or > next article) > > ... > > > > > *7.2 Common Input Control Purposes * > The following input control purposes are intended to relate to the user of > the content and pertain only to information related to that individual. > > > > CP101 > > Name - Inputs used to handle information about a user’s name(s) (e.g. > first name, family name, suffix, etc.) > > CP102 > > Professional Title - Job title (e.g., "Software Engineer", "Senior Vice > President", "Deputy Managing Director") > > As we do not anticipate the list of Common Controls to grow much beyond > the fixed list we have today, using 001 through 099 for the controls, and > 100 through 199 for the inputs further reduces any confusion that numbering > might introduce. Keeping all controls (interaction or input) prefaced with > CP (Common Purpose) also further unifies the idea that both types of > controls are common and important. > > > > I won't die on this hill, but feel strongly that we should further discuss > this subtle change. If we can reach a consensus on list that would be great. > > > > Thanks. > > > > JF > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:19 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> > wrote: > > +1 > > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902> > > LinkedIn > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fdavidmacdonald100&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C9926e13f93624cb82fdf08d552bcb6d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636505892836538571&sdata=2xktaL0Nxn5BPy8WGzpSmJ1N0JN%2FD2C6CwF4Us%2B9Jg4%3D&reserved=0> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fdavidmacd&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C9926e13f93624cb82fdf08d552bcb6d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636505892836538571&sdata=b7oJmXqLAO0gOKzo%2FeungUJow%2Fu6xDClD7hVZD%2F5lz4%3D&reserved=0> > > GitHub > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FDavidMacDonald&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C9926e13f93624cb82fdf08d552bcb6d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636505892836538571&sdata=Dmjvi%2B7jBmS%2BW%2F34vVLUmhIVSiaNeQm1WcyMecmh4TQ%3D&reserved=0> > > www.Can-Adapt.com > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.can-adapt.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C9926e13f93624cb82fdf08d552bcb6d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636505892836538571&sdata=EkyYdoutBtVQY7OJvZZV%2FQ4PG0qnfEJCV9vVMpHy6WU%3D&reserved=0> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > > * Including those with disabilities* > > > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidmacd.com%2Fdisclaimer.html&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C9926e13f93624cb82fdf08d552bcb6d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636505892836538571&sdata=345s5p7hg%2Bu8QSVkc5YDsW2VGu3cAhZ2tM9wAg%2BYlb0%3D&reserved=0> > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:08 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> > wrote: > > Call For Consensus — ends Thursday January 4nd at 7:00PM Boston time. > > > > The Working Group has discussed a change to the list of common purposes > referenced in the Identify Common Purpose SC. The specific change is to add > an identifier to the lists so the individual items can be easily > referenced. > > > > The changes can be previewed at http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/ > common_Purpose_Identifiers/guidelines/index.html#commonpurposes > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fcommon_Purpose_Identifiers%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html%23commonpurposes&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C9926e13f93624cb82fdf08d552bcb6d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636505892836538571&sdata=xh066J27i9m9iKQebufxU%2F4Yqy%2BCYLMj7%2F6of%2FrEjEI%3D&reserved=0> > (section 7.1 and 7.2) as implemented in Pull request #652 ( > https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/652 > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fpull%2F652&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C9926e13f93624cb82fdf08d552bcb6d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636505892836538571&sdata=bd0TKhNVgpRCKQaFzCtCZi1WOPMwgPQZTaI9pEdjoVA%3D&reserved=0> > ). > > > > Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/01/02-ag-minutes.html#item08 > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2018%2F01%2F02-ag-minutes.html%23item08&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C9926e13f93624cb82fdf08d552bcb6d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636505892836538571&sdata=cFID4%2FZpzWZ0%2FTT%2FxAhs6RDKzMQ9eFGDdPp8FJfv0ZQ%3D&reserved=0> > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before > the CfC deadline. > > > > Thanks, > > AWK > > > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > > Group Product Manager, Accessibility > > Adobe > > > > akirkpat@adobe.com > > http://twitter.com/awkawk > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > John Foliot > > Principal Accessibility Strategist > > Deque Systems Inc. > > john.foliot@deque.com > > > > Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion > -- John Foliot Principal Accessibility Strategist Deque Systems Inc. john.foliot@deque.com Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2018 16:19:01 UTC