Re: Evaluation priorities

Michael
is there any easy way to see which ones have been picked up by tomorrwow morning CET
I might be able to do another one but I’d rather be told which one to go for (if I choose, I might choose the same as someone else).
Detlev


> Am 02.04.2018 um 04:00 schrieb Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>:
> 
> I've gone through the evaluations people have done so far of sites to demonstrate implementation of WCAG 2.1. Thanks for all the work done so far. There's good progress, but some urgent stuff still to do and we're at the edge of the timeline. For sites that are now passing, we don't need additional evaluations (pending double-checking), and should focus our energy on the gaps. Please focus evaluation efforts right now only on sites to demonstrate 2.6.1 Motion Actuation, 3.2.6 Status Changes, and sites marked as AA or AAA conformance demonstrations (except CanAdapt which already has sufficient evaluation).
> 
> The sites which particularly need evaluation right now are:
> 
> A11YRules
> A11Y Wins
> Buecherhallen / 2.6.1 Motion Actuation
> Deque University Public
> Knowbility
> Law Office of Lainey Feingold
> Matterhorn Protocol
> Nomensa website
> NY Mayor's office for PWD
> Michael