W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2018

Re: Evaluation priorities

From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 16:44:11 -0400
To: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
Cc: AG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f37e7ddb-0b5e-8e1d-2052-740adee497cd@w3.org>
On 02/04/2018 3:41 PM, Detlev Fischer wrote:
> Michael
> is there any easy way to see which ones have been picked up by 
> tomorrwow morning CET
> I might be able to do another one but I’d rather be told which one to 
> go for (if I choose, I might choose the same as someone else).
It's not super-duper simple, but for the sites I listed, find them in 
the implementations page and look at the "evals" column. If the number 
is less than 2, the site definitely needs another evaluator. If the 
number is 2 or greater, you can follow the link to see a table with the 
evaluation results, which includes people who started an evaluation. If 
the results for some evaluators are looking sparse, and in particular if 
there aren't at least two results recorded for each SC, then the site 
still needs evaluation - though the evaluators who began may or may not 
still be planning to complete their evaluation soon. In a case like this 
I'd focus your efforts just on the SC that don't yet have two results 
recorded in that table.

> Detlev
>> Am 02.04.2018 um 04:00 schrieb Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org 
>> <mailto:cooper@w3.org>>:
>> I've gone through the evaluations people have done so far of sites to 
>> demonstrate implementation of WCAG 2.1. Thanks for all the work done 
>> so far. There's good progress, but some urgent stuff still to do and 
>> we're at the edge of the timeline. For sites that are now passing, we 
>> don't need additional evaluations (pending double-checking), and 
>> should focus our energy on the gaps. Please focus evaluation efforts 
>> right now *only *on sites to demonstrate 2.6.1 Motion Actuation, 
>> 3.2.6 Status Changes, and sites marked as AA or AAA conformance 
>> demonstrations (except CanAdapt which already has sufficient evaluation).
>> The sites which particularly need evaluation right now are:
>>   * A11YRules
>>   * A11Y Wins
>>   * Buecherhallen / 2.6.1 Motion Actuation
>>   * Deque University Public
>>   * Knowbility
>>   * Law Office of Lainey Feingold
>>   * Matterhorn Protocol
>>   * Nomensa website
>>   * NY Mayor's office for PWD
>> Michael
Received on Monday, 2 April 2018 20:44:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:25 UTC