- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 15:33:46 +0000
- To: "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <ADA4E6A4-36CE-4628-8C10-D55F78CABFD3@adobe.com>
For context, at TPAC the language that was nearly agreed to was: Where data can be lost due to user inactivity, users are warned about the estimated length of inactivity that generates the data loss unless the data is preserved for a minimum of 20 hours of user inactivity. Lisa is proposing: Where data can be lost due to user inactivity, users are warned @@once, before an activity timer is set,@@ about the estimated length of inactivity that generates the data loss, unless the data is preserved for a minimum of 20 hours of user inactivity. So, the main change is the addition of “once, before an activity timer is set”. I think that we need to acknowledge that the amount of time before the timer is set may be measured in milliseconds, but it is at least ahead of time. I’m less sure about the “once” part but can live with it. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk From: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com> Reply-To: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com> Date: Friday, December 1, 2017 at 09:37 To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Cc: "lisa.seeman@zoho.com" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> Subject: Re: timeouts Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Resent-Date: Friday, December 1, 2017 at 09:36 +1 On Friday, December 1, 2017 8:47 AM, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> wrote: +1 JF On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:00 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>> wrote: The coga task force can live with the following wording for time outs Where data can be lost due to user inactivity, users are warned once, before an activity timer is set, about the estimated length of inactivity that generates the data loss, unless the data is preserved for a minimum of 20 hours of user inactivity. however we do object to the change the hours from 20 to 24 , but we would rather it goes in with that change then be left out. All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fil.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Flisaseeman%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C4cc65966f9ce44ef1d6a08d538c907d1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636477358425177460&sdata=h9TYyQc9NVdodbVxUmIAVuSviDwAI38HcflS91w98rI%3D&reserved=0>, Twitter<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FSeemanLisa&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C4cc65966f9ce44ef1d6a08d538c907d1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636477358425177460&sdata=a9VFXTMDhGY3i%2BdDpvY0Sw1jgmjYfCfGHp%2FT5pXsSsk%3D&reserved=0> -- John Foliot Principal Accessibility Strategist Deque Systems Inc. john.foliot@deque.com<mailto:john.foliot@deque.com> Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Friday, 1 December 2017 15:34:19 UTC