- From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:57:48 +0000
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CY1PR0301MB209059F165DB839C5406CB91F12E0@CY1PR0301MB2090.namprd03.prod.outlook.>
Ø Resize text includes "up to 200%" without requiring testing across the spectrum. So I question if such an approach cannot be done here with the proper wording. From what I heard people aren’t really testing this across the spectrum and there is no set starting resolution – so right now this SC is being tested very differently across the industry. Jonathan Jonathan Avila Chief Accessibility Officer Level Access, inc. (formerly SSB BART Group, inc.) jon.avila@levelaccess.com<mailto:jon.avila@levelaccess.com> 703.637.8957 (Office) Visit us online: Website<http://www.levelaccess.com/> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/LevelAccessA11y> | Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/LevelAccessA11y> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/level-access> | Blog<http://www.levelaccess.com/blog/> Looking to boost your accessibility knowledge? Check out our free webinars!<http://www.ssbbartgroup.com/webinars/> The information contained in this transmission may be attorney privileged and/or confidential information intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. From: Michael Gower [mailto:michael.gower@ca.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 1:51 PM To: Andrew Kirkpatrick Cc: WCAG Subject: Re: CFC - Change Zoom Content to Reflow Content and change SC text I can live with the wording we have come up with. BUT, I did have a follow up from some comments yesterday. Namely, there was protest against Steve's suggestion that the notion of range get incorporated into the wording about the 320 value. The concern I heard expressed was that this would force testing across the spectrum. Resize text includes "up to 200%" without requiring testing across the spectrum. So I question if such an approach cannot be done here with the proper wording. Michael Gower IBM Accessibility Research 1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC V8T 5C3 gowerm@ca.ibm.com<mailto:gowerm@ca.ibm.com> voice: (250) 220-1146 * cel: (250) 661-0098 * fax: (250) 220-8034 From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>> To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>> Date: 2017-11-14 09:28 AM Subject: CFC - Change Zoom Content to Reflow Content and change SC text ________________________________ Call For Consensus — ends Thursday November 16th at 12:30pm Boston time. The Working Group has discussed a change to Zoom Content SC. The specific changes are detailed in this survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/ZoomContent_20171109/results Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2017/11/14-ag-minutes.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2017_11_14-2Dag-2Dminutes.html&d=DwMGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_9rqR3xSCWQUlv9VpOcJwkP7H0XWQXmxeMmqQl6Fikc&m=1hQIjxl02jJ4WRYLVz3KwmgWV_vG4VWKKidF7pILPf4&s=6Js-bn53ohTyGBxU8KErKm_QnnYFvf-VelZeXI0aAMg&e=> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> http://twitter.com/awkawk<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttp-253A-252F-252Ftwitter.com-252Fawkawk-26data-3D02-257C01-257C-257C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05-257Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1-257C0-257C0-257C636446629619786436-26sdata-3Dc5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA-252FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp-252Fht8-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_9rqR3xSCWQUlv9VpOcJwkP7H0XWQXmxeMmqQl6Fikc&m=1hQIjxl02jJ4WRYLVz3KwmgWV_vG4VWKKidF7pILPf4&s=hUX03Iyds67rLHI1TT3YOxCdsFEBSCbrC9Hy9qy1zoE&e=>
Received on Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:58:49 UTC