Re: CFC - Change Zoom Content to Reflow Content and change SC text

I can live with the wording we have come up with. BUT, I did have a follow 
up from some comments yesterday. Namely, there was protest against Steve's 
suggestion that the notion of range get incorporated into the wording 
about the 320 value. The concern I heard expressed was that this would 
force testing across the spectrum.
Resize text includes "up to 200%" without requiring testing across the 
spectrum. So I question if such an approach cannot be done here with the 
proper wording.
Michael Gower
IBM Accessibility
Research

1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC  V8T 5C3
gowerm@ca.ibm.com
voice: (250) 220-1146 * cel: (250) 661-0098 *  fax: (250) 220-8034



From:   Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
To:     WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Date:   2017-11-14 09:28 AM
Subject:        CFC - Change Zoom Content to Reflow Content and change SC 
text



Call For Consensus — ends Thursday November 16th at 12:30pm Boston time.
 
The Working Group has discussed a change to Zoom Content SC. The specific 
changes are detailed in this survey: 
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/ZoomContent_20171109/results

 
Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2017/11/14-ag-minutes.html 
 
If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not 
been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not 
being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before 
the CfC deadline.
 
Thanks,
AWK
 
Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe 
 
akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk