Re: Zoom / Reflow SC understanding doc updated

> I think I'd rather POUR ourselves into the SCs...

sorry no pun intended. :)

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 7:46 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> ​I'm a little uncomfortable with the benefits section where it compares
> low vision users to blind users. I don't think its a helpful narrative. ​If
> the point is that we should do this, I think simply saying that there are x
> number of low vision users is sufficient.... if we start down this
> comparing path then we'll be some saying there are 10 times more people
> with cognitive disabilities than low vision... it's not really a road we
> want to go down on our official understanding docs.
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Thanks to those people who commented on the zoom understanding doc. I'm
>> afraid I made a lot of updates on the 10th November (last Friday at TPAC).
>>
>> Several of the comments based on the text no-longer apply, but I have
>> integrated changes from Laura and David where possible.
>>
>> Michael: I changed the "direction of text" to "horizontally written
>> languages...", does that help?
>> Also, I've put in one example (as a video) of success. Once we've made
>> progress on techniques, that could be replaced with a demo-style example if
>> that is a better way?
>>
>> Makoto & Rachael, I have one visual example in now, hope to have more
>> when we put the techniques together.
>>
>> If you had a look before, it is worth another quick read through (and it
>> should be quicker, it is shorter now):
>> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/zoom-content/understanding/21/
>> zoom-content.html
>>
>> If you haven't had a chance to look at it yet, please do, the current
>> survey and responses are here:
>> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/understanding_SC/
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -Alastair
>>
>>
>