- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:40:21 -0500
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, WCAG Editors <team-wcag-editors@w3.org>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDaJUTkdDmDza=5UCHzn93FHH5hpxUwyp3Adi_tszjythg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi All I'm a little confused about whether we are supposed to keep working the Understanding given the EO discussion at TPAC. I started reviewing them and doing pull requests to bring them into WCAG 2.0 compatibility, but them EO had a meeting with us and said they'd like to work on the Understanding Docs. I think I'd rather pour ourselves into the SCs... Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thanks to those people who commented on the zoom understanding doc. I'm > afraid I made a lot of updates on the 10th November (last Friday at TPAC). > > Several of the comments based on the text no-longer apply, but I have > integrated changes from Laura and David where possible. > > Michael: I changed the "direction of text" to "horizontally written > languages...", does that help? > Also, I've put in one example (as a video) of success. Once we've made > progress on techniques, that could be replaced with a demo-style example if > that is a better way? > > Makoto & Rachael, I have one visual example in now, hope to have more when > we put the techniques together. > > If you had a look before, it is worth another quick read through (and it > should be quicker, it is shorter now): > https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/zoom-content/understanding/21/ > zoom-content.html > > If you haven't had a chance to look at it yet, please do, the current > survey and responses are here: > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/understanding_SC/ > > Cheers, > > -Alastair > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:40:45 UTC