- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:34:13 +0000
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com>
- CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3D9184DC-1AC5-4C49-8764-ABCA03B1D0CF@adobe.com>
David, I would accept it with one amendment This is a CFC, and the question at this point is whether you can live with it- yes or no, no amendments. People have already weighed in on the CFC and it is what it is. If it fails, we can revisit it with changes and re-CFC it, but the votes of the WG members need to be on the CFC as it is. Thanks, AWK On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:46 AM, ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com<mailto:alands289@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 Alan Smith From: Andrew Kirkpatrick<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 10:13 AM To: WCAG<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: CFC - Changing Accessible Name in Change of Content Importance: High Call For Consensus — ends Tuesday October 3rd at 10:30am Boston time. The Working Group has discussed the issue of syncing the concept of “accessible name” in the Change of Content SC with the “name” concept used in WCAG 2.0’s 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value). https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/371<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fissues%2F371&data=02%7C01%7C%7C6c4e0c0e274d46bc8d5408d50755c2b5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636422987277812417&sdata=22%2FON8W7FbRKji6Uvfxskc3YT2gwVEyWw5QMzP7vMUI%3D&reserved=0> The specific changes are detailed in this pull request: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/377/files<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fpull%2F377%2Ffiles&data=02%7C01%7C%7C6c4e0c0e274d46bc8d5408d50755c2b5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636422987277812417&sdata=ySpREPsK1YPS23Et6dF6S1zxnbNWDkFek1UTJB0nup8%3D&reserved=0> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2017/09/28-ag-minutes.html#item02<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2017%2F09%2F28-ag-minutes.html%23item02&data=02%7C01%7C%7C6c4e0c0e274d46bc8d5408d50755c2b5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636422987277812417&sdata=lFRZEaVUWHMetwduYx%2FBbuZ6ZnqffnLhrnyBstmEYH8%3D&reserved=0> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> http://twitter.com/awkawk<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C6c4e0c0e274d46bc8d5408d50755c2b5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636422987277812417&sdata=2XST61%2FReCpiawv8xnJ6oTmghRlcQXiH8WGYqTXpqYI%3D&reserved=0>
Received on Friday, 29 September 2017 17:34:39 UTC