W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2017

Re: Purpose of Controls terms

From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:13:24 +0100
Message-ID: <599169B4.9070809@interaccess.ie>
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
CC: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Alastair Campbell wrote:
> Michael Cooper wrote:
> > A better solution is to move those lists to terms, with the ednote 
> either in the SC or the terms themselves saying "we're still working 
> on this". **
> Previously the terms were in a definition, I have a feeling they got 
> moved to the SC as that was the easiest way to edit it, not because 
> that was the long-term intent.
Thanks for articulating that Alastair.

> Can we create a definition for “conventional user interface 
> components” and move the terms into that?
> “The following are considered conventional user interface components, 
> in three categories:”
> And an ednote such as:
> “The definition of conventional user interface components includes a 
> list of what is considered a common set of controls which would 
> benefit from being consistently identified. The working group is 
> interested in feedback to do with the list such as updates to the 
> descriptions, additions or removals.”
> Cheers,
> -Alastair

Joshue O Connor
Director | InterAccess.ie
Received on Monday, 14 August 2017 09:13:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:16 UTC