Re: Purpose of Controls terms

Alastair Campbell wrote:
>
> Michael Cooper wrote:
> > A better solution is to move those lists to terms, with the ednote 
> either in the SC or the terms themselves saying "we're still working 
> on this". **
>
> Previously the terms were in a definition, I have a feeling they got 
> moved to the SC as that was the easiest way to edit it, not because 
> that was the long-term intent.
>
Thanks for articulating that Alastair.

Josh
>
> Can we create a definition for “conventional user interface 
> components” and move the terms into that?
> “The following are considered conventional user interface components, 
> in three categories:”
>
> And an ednote such as:
> “The definition of conventional user interface components includes a 
> list of what is considered a common set of controls which would 
> benefit from being consistently identified. The working group is 
> interested in feedback to do with the list such as updates to the 
> descriptions, additions or removals.”
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Alastair
>

-- 
Joshue O Connor
Director | InterAccess.ie