Alastair Campbell wrote: > > Michael Cooper wrote: > > A better solution is to move those lists to terms, with the ednote > either in the SC or the terms themselves saying "we're still working > on this". ** > > Previously the terms were in a definition, I have a feeling they got > moved to the SC as that was the easiest way to edit it, not because > that was the long-term intent. > Thanks for articulating that Alastair. Josh > > Can we create a definition for “conventional user interface > components” and move the terms into that? > “The following are considered conventional user interface components, > in three categories:” > > And an ednote such as: > “The definition of conventional user interface components includes a > list of what is considered a common set of controls which would > benefit from being consistently identified. The working group is > interested in feedback to do with the list such as updates to the > descriptions, additions or removals.” > > Cheers, > > -Alastair > -- Joshue O Connor Director | InterAccess.ieReceived on Monday, 14 August 2017 09:13:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:16 UTC