Re: SC Managers and success criteria review

Hi David,

That’s awesome, I hope a few more people get a chance to review some more as well.

I guess that a lack of “yes” in a column doesn’t mean “no”, but that you aren’t convinced yet?

For the ones I’m managing (9 and 77) it would be helpful to know what aspects you think are not working.

E.g. for 9 (graphics contrast), it looks like you aren’t convinced about the testability, condition vs method, and all-technologies. However, there are no comments on github about those aspects.

I think it does pass those SC criteria, but if you (or others) can’t tell that then it is a problem, I just can’t tell how to address it yet.

I realise it’s more work and you’ve already reviewed more than anyone, but for progress on each one it would help to have specific comments or feedback. Not necessarily from you, from anyone, but you’ve got there first!

Cheers,

-Alastair

PS. For 77, I replied to the comment, I think it does work across technologies, it was something we discussed a while ago and thought we came to a resolution (which generated the second exception).