W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: SC Managers and success criteria review

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:30:36 +0000
To: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <HE1PR0901MB1466AD937A762108DDFBA182B99D0@HE1PR0901MB1466.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
As Josh said the first action for people is to pick one or two SCs to manage.

For those quick off the mark, I'd suggest the second action is to review a few other SCs from the list? Just an initial thumbs up, or questions / comments.

I did about half the MATF ones in about 3 hours tonight, they varied in time depending on complexity, but it was interesting to go through.

To spread it out between people, I suggest sorting by least activity:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Acomments-asc

Once each has a few comments, we'll get a better idea of the shape of things...

Cheers,

-Alastair

________________________________________
From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
Sent: 13 December 2016 17:48
To: WCAG
Subject: SC Managers and success criteria review

Hi all,

On the call today we further discussed the role of the 'SC Manager'. The group members on the call were happy with this direction.
In a nut shell - the SC manager will drive the development, the iteration, acceptance, or deletion of a candidate SC. You can find out more here, as well as sign up for an SC yourself if you are interested in taking up this work. [1]

Thanks to those who have already signed up.

Comments/questions welcome!

Thanks

Josh

[1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2016 00:31:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC