Re[5]: Co-ordinating SC feedback

Great! Thanks Katie :-)

------ Original Message ------
From: "Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL" <ryladog@gmail.com>
To: josh@interaccess.ie; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Sent: 07/12/2016 15:35:43
Subject: RE: Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback

>I have signed up to Manage: Accessibility Metadata  #82 
>(https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/82 ) on the Wiki page (at 
>https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>​​​​​
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>* katie *
>
>
>
>Katie Haritos-Shea
>Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
>
>
>
>Cell: 703-371-5545 |ryladog@gmail.com|Oakton, VA |LinkedIn 
>Profile|Office: 703-371-5545 |@ryladog
>
>
>
>From:josh@interaccess.ie [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 10:15 AM
>To:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
>Subject: Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
>
>
>
>Thanks for stepping up Laura and talking a few SCs :-)
>
>
>
>E'one else - please do point your browser at 
>https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1
>
>
>
>Appreciated.
>
>
>
>Josh
>
>
>
>------ Original Message ------
>
>From: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>
>
>To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>
>Sent: 07/12/2016 13:17:40
>
>Subject: Re[2]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
>
>
>
>>Hi Alastair and all,
>>
>>
>>
>>Yes - I really like this direction, and Alastair thanks for taking a 
>>lead on this, and to David for previous work. You guys have mentioned 
>>an Excel spreadsheet and I'm not
>>
>>averse to that but, I just don't recall seeing it. We do need to work 
>>off something that e'one can see. I'm concerned also about the 
>>accessibility of the tool/platform that we use and agree that Table 
>>wiki markup may not the best option as things can break easily.  The 
>>chairs will need to discuss this general 'SC Managers' approach in 
>>more detail but at the very least - to get the ball rolling it would 
>>not hurt to quickly get a sense of those in the group who are willing 
>>and able to ramp up this SC review work.
>>
>>
>>
>>So with this in mind I've set up a draft 'SC Managers' page in our 
>>wiki, not with a table but just a simple page where people can add 
>>their names, and list SCs they wish to manage. There is also a brief 
>>guide. [1]
>>
>>To get this going, I have added a couple of names of working group 
>>members who have 'signed up' to manage SCs (Alastair, Glenda, Wayne, 
>>David),
>>
>>along with the candidate SCs they have choosen. Please feel free to 
>>add yourself and any SC you wish to work on. The list is available 
>>here [2]
>>
>>Alastair, I've incorporated some of your suggestions into the 'guide' 
>>- very helpful.
>>
>>
>>
>>IMO the managers role - as I see it, is someone who can co-ordinate 
>>the feedback and help iterate the SC, incorporate feedback, make edits 
>>etc.
>>
>>It does not have to be the originator of the SC, and that may even be 
>>preferable as it could inject objectivity into proceedings, as well as 
>>a fresh perspective.
>>
>>The SC manager would also look for similarities/synergies etc with 
>>other candidate SCs and have other duties suggested in the guide.
>>
>>
>>
>>In terms of scheduling reviews - I like the idea of Phases/Milestones 
>>- we are currently in an provisional review/acceptance phase.
>>
>>If 20 people from the group take  even 3 SCs each then we can make 
>>progress steadily. This should be a manageable number for anyone.
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks for input all - this is a draft very useful and hope it is 
>>workable for e'one.
>>
>>
>>
>>Comments/suggestions welcome
>>
>>
>>
>>[1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1
>>
>>[2] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Joshue O Connor | Director
>>
>>InterAccess.ie - Accessible UX
>>
>>
>>