- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:11:17 -0500
- To: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Cc: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDb4sqPG+GyOrENDbFGno9aTopWWt9LM-8h_awrg31i_qQ@mail.gmail.com>
I can manage many of the 11 low vision ones if the team wants. I was not on the LVTF but am familiar enough with the issues that I can probably identify the ones that fit our requirements for SCs https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria Every success criteria we accept for 2.1 will need to meet these in order to be consistent with the existing WCAG Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com > wrote: > I have signed up to Manage: Accessibility Metadata #82 ( > https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/82 ) on the Wiki page (at > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** katie ** > > > > *Katie Haritos-Shea* > *Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)* > > > > *Cell: 703-371-5545 <703-371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com* > <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile* > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office: 703-371-5545 > <703-371-5545> **|* *@ryladog* <https://twitter.com/Ryladog> > > > > *From:* josh@interaccess.ie [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie] > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 7, 2016 10:15 AM > *To:* w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> > *Subject:* Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback > > > > Thanks for stepping up Laura and talking a few SCs :-) > > > > E'one else - please do point your browser at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/ > wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1 > > > > Appreciated. > > > > Josh > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie> > > To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > > Sent: 07/12/2016 13:17:40 > > Subject: Re[2]: Co-ordinating SC feedback > > > > Hi Alastair and all, > > > > Yes - I really like this direction, and Alastair thanks for taking a lead > on this, and to David for previous work. You guys have mentioned an Excel > spreadsheet and I'm not > > averse to that but, I just don't recall seeing it. We do need to work off > something that e'one can see. I'm concerned also about the accessibility of > the tool/platform that we use and agree that Table wiki markup may not the > best option as things can break easily. The chairs will need to discuss > this general 'SC Managers' approach in more detail but at the very least - > to get the ball rolling it would not hurt to quickly get a sense of those > in the group who are willing and able to ramp up this SC review work. > > > > So with this in mind I've set up a draft 'SC Managers' page in our wiki, > not with a table but just a simple page where people can add their names, > and list SCs they wish to manage. There is also a brief guide. [1] > > To get this going, I have added a couple of names of working group members > who have 'signed up' to manage SCs (Alastair, Glenda, Wayne, David), > > along with the candidate SCs they have choosen. Please feel free to add > yourself and any SC you wish to work on. The list is available here [2] > > Alastair, I've incorporated some of your suggestions into the 'guide' - > very helpful. > > > > IMO the managers role - as I see it, is someone who can co-ordinate the > feedback and help iterate the SC, incorporate feedback, make edits etc. > > It does not have to be the originator of the SC, and that may even be > preferable as it could inject objectivity into proceedings, as well as a > fresh perspective. > > The SC manager would also look for similarities/synergies etc with other > candidate SCs and have other duties suggested in the guide. > > > > In terms of scheduling reviews - I like the idea of Phases/Milestones - we > are currently in an provisional review/acceptance phase. > > If 20 people from the group take even 3 SCs each then we can make > progress steadily. This should be a manageable number for anyone. > > > > Thanks for input all - this is a draft very useful and hope it is workable > for e'one. > > > > Comments/suggestions welcome > > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1 > > [2] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues > > > > > > Joshue O Connor | Director > > *InterAccess.ie - Accessible UX* > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:11:53 UTC