W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback

From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:11:17 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAdDpDb4sqPG+GyOrENDbFGno9aTopWWt9LM-8h_awrg31i_qQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
Cc: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I can manage many of the 11 low vision ones if the team wants. I was not on
the LVTF but am familiar enough with the issues that I can probably
identify the ones that fit our requirements for SCs

https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria

Every success criteria we accept for 2.1 will need to meet these in order
to be consistent with the existing WCAG

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com
> wrote:

> I have signed up to Manage: Accessibility Metadata  #82 (
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/82 ) on the Wiki page (at
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ​​​​​
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ** katie **
>
>
>
> *Katie Haritos-Shea*
> *Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)*
>
>
>
> *Cell: 703-371-5545 <703-371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com*
> <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile*
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office: 703-371-5545
> <703-371-5545> **|* *@ryladog* <https://twitter.com/Ryladog>
>
>
>
> *From:* josh@interaccess.ie [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 7, 2016 10:15 AM
> *To:* w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
>
>
>
> Thanks for stepping up Laura and talking a few SCs :-)
>
>
>
> E'one else - please do point your browser at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/
> wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1
>
>
>
> Appreciated.
>
>
>
> Josh
>
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
>
> From: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>
>
> To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>
> Sent: 07/12/2016 13:17:40
>
> Subject: Re[2]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
>
>
>
> Hi Alastair and all,
>
>
>
> Yes - I really like this direction, and Alastair thanks for taking a lead
> on this, and to David for previous work. You guys have mentioned an Excel
> spreadsheet and I'm not
>
> averse to that but, I just don't recall seeing it. We do need to work off
> something that e'one can see. I'm concerned also about the accessibility of
> the tool/platform that we use and agree that Table wiki markup may not the
> best option as things can break easily.  The chairs will need to discuss
> this general 'SC Managers' approach in more detail but at the very least -
> to get the ball rolling it would not hurt to quickly get a sense of those
> in the group who are willing and able to ramp up this SC review work.
>
>
>
> So with this in mind I've set up a draft 'SC Managers' page in our wiki,
> not with a table but just a simple page where people can add their names,
> and list SCs they wish to manage. There is also a brief guide. [1]
>
> To get this going, I have added a couple of names of working group members
> who have 'signed up' to manage SCs (Alastair, Glenda, Wayne, David),
>
> along with the candidate SCs they have choosen. Please feel free to add
> yourself and any SC you wish to work on. The list is available here [2]
>
> Alastair, I've incorporated some of your suggestions into the 'guide' -
> very helpful.
>
>
>
> IMO the managers role - as I see it, is someone who can co-ordinate the
> feedback and help iterate the SC, incorporate feedback, make edits etc.
>
> It does not have to be the originator of the SC, and that may even be
> preferable as it could inject objectivity into proceedings, as well as a
> fresh perspective.
>
> The SC manager would also look for similarities/synergies etc with other
> candidate SCs and have other duties suggested in the guide.
>
>
>
> In terms of scheduling reviews - I like the idea of Phases/Milestones - we
> are currently in an provisional review/acceptance phase.
>
> If 20 people from the group take  even 3 SCs each then we can make
> progress steadily. This should be a manageable number for anyone.
>
>
>
> Thanks for input all - this is a draft very useful and hope it is workable
> for e'one.
>
>
>
> Comments/suggestions welcome
>
>
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1
>
> [2] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues
>
>
>
>
>
> Joshue O Connor | Director
>
> *InterAccess.ie - Accessible UX*
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:11:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC