Re: Re[2]: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February

Don't forget. We worked separately as task forces. There will be overlap.
75 could shrink a lot with some merging. With holidays February might be
too ambitious.

We might organize these conceptually as follows: (1) Determine the unmet
need identified by the SC. This will usually be found in the Description
and Benefits sections. (2) Develop a needs set. (3) Group SCs by need. This
may help in merging similar SCs.

I sure wish github was accessible for low vision without having to regress
back to horizontal scrolling. Anyone who knows how to get large reflowed
text from github, let me know. This will be the hard part of the job for me.

Wayne

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:53 AM, josh@interaccess.ie <josh@interaccess.ie>
wrote:

> Thanks Katie - that kind of think could be very helpful :-)
>
> Josh
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL" <ryladog@gmail.com>
> To: "'Wilco Fiers'" <wilco.fiers@deque.com>; "'David MacDonald'" <
> david@can-adapt.com>
> Cc: "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Sent: 02/12/2016 14:38:05
> Subject: RE: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> As stated numerous times through-out this last year, I suggest we meet en
> mass for several days, either virtually or F2F, these are too important to
> have single or even small groups make a determination on - in or out….
>
>
>
> If we want a get tpgether I can see if Deque HQ would host an in-house
> combined with virtual attendees meeting in Jan….
>
>
>
> ​​​​​
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ** katie **
>
>
>
> *Katie Haritos-Shea*
> *Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)*
>
>
>
> *Cell: 703-371-5545 <(703)%20371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com*
> <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile*
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office: 703-371-5545
> <(703)%20371-5545> **|* *@ryladog* <https://twitter.com/Ryladog>
>
>
>
> *From:* Wilco Fiers [mailto:wilco.fiers@deque.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 10:28 PM
> *To:* David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>
> *Cc:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February
>
>
>
> Hi David,
>
>
>
> That's a very good question. There are currently 61 marked as ready for
> review. 1 from DPUB, 4 by LVTF, 15 by MWTF, and another 41 by COGA.
>
>
>
> It certainly doesn't seem like putting every SC through the survey will
> get us there fast enough. We should probably group them and have a few
> people do the reviews of each within the next few weeks. That way
> everything gets a pass, although be it not extensively. By doing that I bet
> we can weed out the ones that will likely cause lots of discussion, and
> prioritise them based on that.
>
>
>
> Just my 2 cents :)
>
>
>
> Wilco
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:25 AM, David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>
> wrote:
>
> Wow, 75 SCs to vet before our First Public Working Draft due In
> February... plus figuring out where they go and how to order things in the
> new WCAG.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts on how to do that in 12 meetings?
>
>
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
>
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Wilco Fiers*
>
> Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair Auto-WCAG
>
>