W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: Re[2]: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February

From: David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 20:41:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAdDpDY0aHfnH=Y7FEJbQ9Tyeg_C9JXMb3KUSo49SP95965vDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
Cc: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>, Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Wayne

I've been following the SCs pretty close and in my analysis I can only see
an overlap of 4-5 SCs, involving a total of 8-10 SCs. Perhaps others will
find more, but  doubt it.

I have the SC's in the analysis spreadsheet that you could squeeze the
columns on, if that would help.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote:

> Don't forget. We worked separately as task forces. There will be overlap.
> 75 could shrink a lot with some merging. With holidays February might be
> too ambitious.
>
> We might organize these conceptually as follows: (1) Determine the unmet
> need identified by the SC. This will usually be found in the Description
> and Benefits sections. (2) Develop a needs set. (3) Group SCs by need. This
> may help in merging similar SCs.
>
> I sure wish github was accessible for low vision without having to regress
> back to horizontal scrolling. Anyone who knows how to get large reflowed
> text from github, let me know. This will be the hard part of the job for me.
>
> Wayne
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:53 AM, josh@interaccess.ie <josh@interaccess.ie>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Katie - that kind of think could be very helpful :-)
>>
>> Josh
>>
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL" <ryladog@gmail.com>
>> To: "'Wilco Fiers'" <wilco.fiers@deque.com>; "'David MacDonald'" <
>> david@can-adapt.com>
>> Cc: "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> Sent: 02/12/2016 14:38:05
>> Subject: RE: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> As stated numerous times through-out this last year, I suggest we meet en
>> mass for several days, either virtually or F2F, these are too important to
>> have single or even small groups make a determination on - in or out….
>>
>>
>>
>> If we want a get tpgether I can see if Deque HQ would host an in-house
>> combined with virtual attendees meeting in Jan….
>>
>>
>>
>> ​​​​​
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ** katie **
>>
>>
>>
>> *Katie Haritos-Shea*
>> *Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)*
>>
>>
>>
>> *Cell: 703-371-5545 <(703)%20371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com*
>> <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile*
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office: 703-371-5545
>> <(703)%20371-5545> **|* *@ryladog* <https://twitter.com/Ryladog>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Wilco Fiers [mailto:wilco.fiers@deque.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 10:28 PM
>> *To:* David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>
>> *Cc:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>>
>>
>> That's a very good question. There are currently 61 marked as ready for
>> review. 1 from DPUB, 4 by LVTF, 15 by MWTF, and another 41 by COGA.
>>
>>
>>
>> It certainly doesn't seem like putting every SC through the survey will
>> get us there fast enough. We should probably group them and have a few
>> people do the reviews of each within the next few weeks. That way
>> everything gets a pass, although be it not extensively. By doing that I bet
>> we can weed out the ones that will likely cause lots of discussion, and
>> prioritise them based on that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Just my 2 cents :)
>>
>>
>>
>> Wilco
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:25 AM, David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Wow, 75 SCs to vet before our First Public Working Draft due In
>> February... plus figuring out where they go and how to order things in the
>> new WCAG.
>>
>>
>>
>> Any thoughts on how to do that in 12 meetings?
>>
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David MacDonald
>>
>>
>>
>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>>
>> Tel:  613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
>>
>> LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>
>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>>
>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>>
>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>>
>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>
>>
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Wilco Fiers*
>>
>> Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair Auto-WCAG
>>
>>
>

image001.gif
(image/gif attachment: image001.gif)

Received on Saturday, 3 December 2016 01:41:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC