W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re[2]: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February

From: <josh@interaccess.ie>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 14:53:21 +0000
To: "Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL" <ryladog@gmail.com>, "'Wilco Fiers'" <wilco.fiers@deque.com>, "'David MacDonald'" <david@can-adapt.com>
Cc: 'WCAG' <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <emfecbd727-d1d0-43b8-98e3-c3848d2fcbfa@josh_machine>
Thanks Katie - that kind of think could be very helpful :-)

Josh

------ Original Message ------
From: "Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL" <ryladog@gmail.com>
To: "'Wilco Fiers'" <wilco.fiers@deque.com>; "'David MacDonald'" 
<david@can-adapt.com>
Cc: "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: 02/12/2016 14:38:05
Subject: RE: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February

>Hi All,
>
>
>
>As stated numerous times through-out this last year, I suggest we meet 
>en mass for several days, either virtually or F2F, these are too 
>important to have single or even small groups make a determination on - 
>in or out….
>
>
>
>If we want a get tpgether I can see if Deque HQ would host an in-house 
>combined with virtual attendees meeting in Jan….
>
>
>
>​​​​​
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>* katie *
>
>
>
>Katie Haritos-Shea
>Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
>
>
>
>Cell: 703-371-5545 |ryladog@gmail.com|Oakton, VA |LinkedIn 
>Profile|Office: 703-371-5545 |@ryladog
>
>
>
>From: Wilco Fiers [mailto:wilco.fiers@deque.com]
>Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 10:28 PM
>To: David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>
>Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>Subject: Re: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February
>
>
>
>Hi David,
>
>
>
>That's a very good question. There are currently 61 marked as ready for 
>review. 1 from DPUB, 4 by LVTF, 15 by MWTF, and another 41 by COGA.
>
>
>
>It certainly doesn't seem like putting every SC through the survey will 
>get us there fast enough. We should probably group them and have a few 
>people do the reviews of each within the next few weeks. That way 
>everything gets a pass, although be it not extensively. By doing that I 
>bet we can weed out the ones that will likely cause lots of discussion, 
>and prioritise them based on that.
>
>
>
>Just my 2 cents :)
>
>
>
>Wilco
>
>
>
>On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:25 AM, David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com> 
>wrote:
>
>>Wow, 75 SCs to vet before our First Public Working Draft due In 
>>February... plus figuring out where they go and how to order things in 
>>the new WCAG.
>>
>>
>>
>>Any thoughts on how to do that in 12 meetings?
>>
>>
>>
>>https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues
>>
>>
>>
>>Cheers,
>>David MacDonald
>>
>>
>>
>>CanAdaptSolutions Inc.
>>
>>Tel:  613.235.4902
>>
>>LinkedIn
>>
>>twitter.com/davidmacd
>>
>>GitHub
>>
>>www.Can-Adapt.com
>>
>>
>>
>>   Adapting the web to all users
>>
>>             Including those with disabilities
>>
>>
>>
>>If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy 
>>policy
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>
>Wilco Fiers
>
>Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair 
>Auto-WCAG
>
>

image001.gif
(image/gif attachment: image001.gif)

Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 14:50:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC