- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:11:17 -0500
- To: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
- Cc: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDZQfaAdft2LUe8rf9MjggGR_AacDjXhsNUf4Y_4uqwVGw@mail.gmail.com>
I've changed it to AA on the spread sheet http://tinyurl.com/jmo9st4 Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com> wrote: > David, > > I propose we move Interactive Element Contrast (Minimum) #issue 10 to AA. > As I started working on that proposed SC, it was in the LVTF as a Single > A...but now I see it's "sister" SC Informational Graphic Contrast > (Minimum) is suggested for AA. > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/10 > > So...I expect a number of SC will migrate to a different level as they are > reviewed at the WCAG WG :) > > Thanks for having such great energy and a super analytical mind! > G > > glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com | 512.963.3773 > > > *web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:26 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> > wrote: > >> I've gone over all the Success Criteria looking for Overlaps. >> >> Surprisingly there's not that much overlap. I've thrown the net pretty >> wide and only come up with the following possible combinations of overlap. >> >> - Issue 10 LVTF and 36 COGA >> - Issue 8 LVTF, 51 COGA, 78 LVTF, 26 COGA >> - Issue 2 MATF and 54 COGA >> - Issue 18 ADHOC, and 6 COGA >> >> There may be opportunities to combine SCs within a task for from 2 or 3 >> short to a longer one, but that would be a different analysis. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> David MacDonald >> >> >> >> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* >> Tel: 613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902> >> >> LinkedIn >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> >> >> twitter.com/davidmacd >> >> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> >> >> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> >> >> >> >> * Adapting the web to all users* >> * Including those with disabilities* >> >> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy >> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> >> >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:26 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> >> wrote: >> >>> ​>>Josh says: Just get started dude! >>> >>> I pulled an all nighter and started the analysis​ >>> >>> ====== >>> MATF = 15 >>> Level A = 9 >>> Level AA = 6 >>> >>> ======== >>> LVTF = 13 >>> Level A = 6 >>> Level AA = 7 >>> >>> ============ >>> COGA = 38 >>> Level A = 16 >>> Level AA = 19 >>> Level AAA = 2 >>> Unassigned level = 1 (Issue 39) >>> Of those 4 modify AAA and move to AA >>> Of those 4 modify AAA and move to A >>> >>> ============ >>> DPUB = 1 >>> DPUB still writing SC >>> >>> ===== >>> AD HOC = 1 >>> Level A = 1 >>> >>> I've put up a Google Sheet to try to organize these and analyze: >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XShLFX8fxHYYLn8A6avD >>> wu37w9JfnZCGWvAKBpK9Xo4/edit?usp=sharing >>> >>> Tiny URL >>> http://tinyurl.com/jmo9st4 >>> >>> There are two worksheets in the Workbook. One is a summary (like above) >>> and the other is the details of the SCs >>> >>> Cheers, >>> David MacDonald >>> >>> >>> >>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* >>> Tel: 613.235.4902 >>> >>> LinkedIn >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> >>> >>> twitter.com/davidmacd >>> >>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> >>> >>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> >>> >>> >>> >>> * Adapting the web to all users* >>> * Including those with disabilities* >>> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy >>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:11 AM, josh@interaccess.ie <josh@interaccess.ie >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> To be serious, yes - we do appreciated that there is a lot to do and it >>>> is a big ask for the group. We will be staggering the items that are for >>>> review so we hope this will make things a little easier. Actually, we >>>> are really looking for 'provisional approval' of these new SCs at this >>>> point, so these SCs are the first tranche 'candidates' and this phase is >>>> a really a first pass. >>>> >>>> In this pass we aim to whittle these down, reduce duplication, identify >>>> where SCs from TFs are related and can be merged etc. >>>> Then identify sets that will be chosen for any final cut. So this is a >>>> rough overview of what we will be doing. So, lets all take a deep breath, >>>> roll up our sleeves etc. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Josh >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 16:11:58 UTC