Re: Re[2]: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.

I've changed it to AA on the spread sheet
http://tinyurl.com/jmo9st4

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com> wrote:

> David,
>
> I propose we move Interactive Element Contrast (Minimum) #issue 10 to AA.
> As I started working on that proposed SC, it was in the LVTF as a Single
> A...but now I see it's "sister" SC  Informational Graphic Contrast
> (Minimum) is suggested for AA.
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/10
>
> So...I expect a number of SC will migrate to a different level as they are
> reviewed at the WCAG WG :)
>
> Thanks for having such great energy and a super analytical mind!
> G
>
> glenda sims    |   team a11y lead   |    deque.com    |    512.963.3773
>
>
> *web for everyone. web on everything.* -  w3 goals
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:26 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> I've gone over all the Success Criteria looking for Overlaps.
>>
>> Surprisingly there's not that much overlap. I've thrown the net pretty
>> wide and only come up with the following possible combinations of overlap.
>>
>> - Issue 10 LVTF and 36 COGA
>> - Issue 8 LVTF, 51 COGA, 78 LVTF, 26 COGA
>> - Issue 2 MATF and 54 COGA
>> - Issue 18 ADHOC, and 6 COGA
>>
>> There may be opportunities to combine SCs within a task for from 2 or 3
>> short to a longer one, but that would be a different analysis.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David MacDonald
>>
>>
>>
>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>> Tel:  613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
>>
>> LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>
>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>>
>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>>
>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:26 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ​>>Josh says: Just get started dude!
>>>
>>> I pulled an all nighter and started the analysis​
>>>
>>> ======
>>> MATF = 15
>>> Level A = 9
>>> Level AA = 6
>>>
>>> ========
>>> LVTF = 13
>>> Level A = 6
>>> Level AA = 7
>>>
>>> ============
>>> COGA = 38
>>> Level A = 16
>>> Level AA = 19
>>> Level AAA = 2
>>> Unassigned level = 1 (Issue 39)
>>> Of those 4 modify AAA and move to AA
>>> Of those 4 modify AAA and move to A
>>>
>>> ============
>>> DPUB = 1
>>> DPUB still writing SC
>>>
>>> =====
>>> AD HOC = 1
>>> Level A = 1
>>>
>>> I've put up a Google Sheet to try to organize these and analyze:
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XShLFX8fxHYYLn8A6avD
>>> wu37w9JfnZCGWvAKBpK9Xo4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> Tiny URL
>>> http://tinyurl.com/jmo9st4
>>>
>>> There are two worksheets in the Workbook. One is a summary (like above)
>>> and the other is the details of the SCs
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> David MacDonald
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>>> Tel:  613.235.4902
>>>
>>> LinkedIn
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>>
>>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>>>
>>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>>>
>>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>>
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:11 AM, josh@interaccess.ie <josh@interaccess.ie
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> To be serious, yes - we do appreciated that there is a lot to do and it
>>>> is a big ask for the group. We will be staggering the items that are for
>>>> review so we hope this will make things a little easier. Actually, we
>>>> are really looking for 'provisional approval' of these new SCs at this
>>>> point, so these SCs are the first tranche  'candidates' and this phase is
>>>> a really a first pass.
>>>>
>>>> In this pass we aim to whittle these down, reduce duplication, identify
>>>> where SCs from TFs are related and can be merged etc.
>>>> Then identify sets that will be chosen for any final cut. So this is a
>>>> rough overview of what we will be doing. So, lets all take a deep breath,
>>>> roll up our sleeves etc.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Josh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 16:11:58 UTC