Re: duplicate SCs filed

Got it..

Perhaps we should have different handles for different SCs...

I found it confusing, especially since the text of the SC is almost the
same.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:53 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> Hi David
>
> Issue 31 and 41 are similar but not duplicates. They have very different
> scopes which enable a different conformance level and balance user need
> with author burden.
>
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
>
> ---- On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:21:50 +0200 David MacDonald<
> david100@sympatico.ca> wrote ----
>
> Issue 73 and 79 seem to be duplicates LVTF
> Issue 8 and 80 seem to be duplicates LVTF
> Issues 30 and 41
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> http://www.can-adapt.com/
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
>