W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: duplicate SCs filed

From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:53:03 +0200
To: "David MacDonald" <david100@sympatico.ca>
Cc: "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <158bebac943.125b5be5c80278.2110452661030779439@zoho.com>


            Hi DavidIssue 31 and 41 are similar but not duplicates. They have very different scopes which enable a different conformance level and balance user need with author burden. All the bestLisa SeemanLinkedIn, Twitter---- On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:21:50 +0200  David MacDonald<david100@sympatico.ca> wrote ----Issue 73 and 79 seem to be duplicates LVTFIssue 8 and 80 seem to be duplicates LVTFIssues 30 and 41 Cheers,David MacDonald CanAdapt Solutions Inc.Tel:  613.235.4902LinkedIn twitter.com/davidmacdGitHubhttp://www.can-adapt.com/   Adapting the web to all users            Including those with disabilitiesIf you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy  

Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 08:53:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC