W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

RE: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"

From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:24:27 +0000
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BY2PR0701MB19902237A3F4BBB68E246B21AB8C0@BY2PR0701MB1990.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 9:13 AM

AWK: I think that I’d need to understand what you’re calling an archive better Jason.  What’s the issue that you’re concerned about?

[Jason] http://www.example.org/compressed-file-containing-publication.epub

Is not a set of Web pages under either the current or proposed text, since under the definition of “Web page”, each page needs to be associated with a single HTTP URI.

Here, the compressed zip archive as a whole has a single URI and it is obtainable via HTTP. If its contents were extracted onto the server’s file system, they would be a “set of Web pages”, but the compressed archive file itself (in zip format, in this case) is not.

Nothing in the proposed CFC changes this fact; it’s still a problem which needs to be addressed in the definition of “Web page” or elsewhere.


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.

Thank you for your compliance.

Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:25:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC