RE: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"

From: josh []
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 8:52 AM

Yes Jason.  We feel the example is implicitly covered by the current definition and this a method of making it more explicit.
[Jason] In that case I’m comfortable supporting the CFC, as long as the issue of compressed archive files (including EPUB archives) and their interaction with the definitions of “Web page” and “Set of Web pages” remains open. As previously discussed, this problem is not confined to publishing use cases.


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.

Thank you for your compliance.


Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:38:59 UTC