- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:21:48 -0600
- To: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
+1 to this CfC for 2.1 On 11/29/16, josh@interaccess.ie <josh@interaccess.ie> wrote: > To give people a chance to review, we're extending this to Sat 3rd at > 5pm Boston Time. > > Please do review Issue 72 for background > https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/72 > > Thanks > > Josh > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie> > To: "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > Sent: 29/11/2016 17:46:56 > Subject: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web > pages" > >>CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday Dec 1st at 5:00pm Boston time. >> >>Hi all, >> >>On todays call with the DPUB working group, the suggested example text >>was proposed to be added to the WCAG definition of a 'set of Webpages' >>in order to better address the needs of DPUB stakeholders. >> >>The current definition can be seen here: >>https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#set-of-web-pagesdef >> >>DPUB Proposal for language: Example: A publication is split across >>multiple Web pages, where each page contains one chapter or other >>significant section of the work. The publication is logically a single >>contiguous unit, and contains navigation features that enable access to >>the full set of pages. >> >>The item was discussed on the WG call and positive responses were >>proffered - (https://www.w3.org/2016/11/29-wai-wcag-minutes.html). >> >>The original issue on Github: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/72 >> >>If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have >>not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you >>“not being able to live with” this position, please let the group know >>before the CfC deadline. >> >>Thanks >> >>Joshue O Connor | Director >>InterAccess.ie - Accessible UX -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:22:23 UTC