W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"

From: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:14:15 -0600
Message-ID: <CAH2ngERR8NPwsudQ2hWAiGgCc3iNSuXnyKSiT2L=ijo26cr7xA@mail.gmail.com>
To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, josh <josh@interaccess.ie>, "jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com" <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
+1 to this CfC

Glenda

glenda sims    |   team a11y lead   |    deque.com    |    512.963.3773


*web for everyone. web on everything.* -  w3 goals

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:59 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> For this CFC +1 from me....
>
> We can deal with the Understanding separately...
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel:  613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:58 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> That's fine I think if there is an example in the definition and in the
>> Understanding of 2.1. At least we'll have clarity that WCAG 2 includes
>> online ePub.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David MacDonald
>>
>>
>>
>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>> Tel:  613.235.4902
>>
>> LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>
>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>>
>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>>
>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> CfC’s need to be a yes/no answer please.
>>>
>>> I’d hold off on the Understanding suggestion as it may be that we wind
>>> up with a single Understanding document that covers WCAG 2 (2.0 and 2.1).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> AWK
>>>
>>> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>>> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
>>> Adobe
>>>
>>> akirkpat@adobe.com
>>> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>>>
>>> From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
>>> Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 14:52
>>> To: josh <josh@interaccess.ie>
>>> Cc: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
>>> >
>>> Subject: Re: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web
>>> pages"
>>> Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 14:52
>>>
>>> For 2.0, we can't change a word of the normative document... but we can
>>> add the exact same example into the 2.0 Understanding doc that will be in
>>> the 2.1 glossary.
>>>
>>> So I propose a friendly amendment to have two changes.
>>> 1) Add the example to the 2.1 Glossary
>>> 2) Add the same example to the Understanding document for 2.0
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> David MacDonald
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>>> Tel:  613.235.4902
>>>
>>> LinkedIn
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>>
>>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>>>
>>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>>>
>>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>>
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:56 PM, josh <josh@interaccess.ie> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Jon, yes. This is for 2.1.
>>>> Also people should feel free to review this issue for a little longer
>>>> than the scheduled deadline and comment etc.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Josh
>>>>
>>>> InterAccess - Accessible UX
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original message --------
>>>> From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
>>>> Date: 29/11/2016 18:14 (GMT+00:00)
>>>> To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>>>> Subject: RE: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web
>>>> pages"
>>>>
>>>> Ø  On todays call with the DPUB working group, the suggested example
>>>> text was proposed to be added to the WCAG definition of a 'set of Webpages'
>>>> in order to better address the needs of DPUB stakeholders.
>>>>
>>>> Josh, to be clear, are we talking about this update for WCAG 2.1 or
>>>> WCAG 2.0.  For WCAG 2.0 since the whole definition section is normative I
>>>> don’t think we can it for 2.0 but for 2.1 it seems like it would be
>>>> backwards compatible.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan Avila
>>>>
>>>> Chief Accessibility Officer
>>>>
>>>> SSB BART Group
>>>>
>>>> jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com
>>>>
>>>> 703.637.8957 (Office)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:*josh@interaccess.ie [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie]
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2016 12:47 PM
>>>> *To:* WCAG
>>>> *Subject:* CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web
>>>> pages"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday Dec 1st at 5:00pm Boston time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> On todays call with the DPUB working group, the suggested example text
>>>> was proposed to be added to the WCAG definition of a 'set of Webpages' in
>>>> order to better address the needs of DPUB stakeholders.
>>>>
>>>> The current definition can be seen here:
>>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#set-of-web-pagesdef
>>>>
>>>> DPUB Proposal for language: Example: A publication is split across
>>>> multiple Web pages, where each page contains one chapter or other
>>>> significant section of the work. The publication is logically a single
>>>> contiguous unit, and contains navigation features that enable access to the
>>>> full set of pages.
>>>>
>>>> The item was discussed on the WG call and positive responses were
>>>> proffered - (https://www.w3.org/2016/11/29-wai-wcag-minutes.html).
>>>>
>>>> The original issue on Github: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/72
>>>>
>>>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have
>>>> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
>>>> being able to live with” this position, please let the group know before
>>>> the CfC deadline.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Joshue O Connor | Director
>>>>
>>>> *InterAccess.ie - Accessible UX*
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:14:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC