- From: <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:03:15 +0000
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <eme4605e51-b66d-4b12-adcd-e7f3a8503485@josh_machine>
To give people a chance to review, we're extending this to Sat 3rd at 5pm Boston Time. Please do review Issue 72 for background https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/72 Thanks Josh ------ Original Message ------ From: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie> To: "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: 29/11/2016 17:46:56 Subject: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages" >CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday Dec 1st at 5:00pm Boston time. > >Hi all, > >On todays call with the DPUB working group, the suggested example text >was proposed to be added to the WCAG definition of a 'set of Webpages' >in order to better address the needs of DPUB stakeholders. > >The current definition can be seen here: >https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#set-of-web-pagesdef > >DPUB Proposal for language: Example: A publication is split across >multiple Web pages, where each page contains one chapter or other >significant section of the work. The publication is logically a single >contiguous unit, and contains navigation features that enable access to >the full set of pages. > >The item was discussed on the WG call and positive responses were >proffered - (https://www.w3.org/2016/11/29-wai-wcag-minutes.html). > >The original issue on Github: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/72 > >If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have >not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you >“not being able to live with” this position, please let the group know >before the CfC deadline. > >Thanks > >Joshue O Connor | Director >InterAccess.ie - Accessible UX
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2016 19:00:21 UTC