RE: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"

+1

Best regards,
-Vasu
--
Srinivasu Chakravarthula
Lead Accessibility Consultant
Informatica<http://informatica.com/> Business Solutions Pvt Ltd.,
Work: +91-80-4020-3760 | Cell: +91 99008 10881
Website<http://srinivasu.org/> | Accessibility Blog<http://serveominclusion.com/> | LinkedIn<http://linkedin.com/in/srinivasuc> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/CSrinivasu>

From: Glenda Sims [mailto:glenda.sims@deque.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 2:44 AM
To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>; josh <josh@interaccess.ie>; jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"

+1 to this CfC

Glenda

glenda sims    |   team a11y lead   |    deque.com<http://deque.com>    |    512.963.3773

web for everyone. web on everything. -  w3 goals

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:59 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca<mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>> wrote:
For this CFC +1 from me....

We can deal with the Understanding separately...

Cheers,
David MacDonald



CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
Tel:  613.235.4902<tel:(613)%20235-4902>

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd<http://twitter.com/davidmacd>

GitHub<https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com<http://www.can-adapt.com/>



  Adapting the web to all users
            Including those with disabilities

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:58 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca<mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>> wrote:
That's fine I think if there is an example in the definition and in the Understanding of 2.1. At least we'll have clarity that WCAG 2 includes online ePub.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
Tel:  613.235.4902<tel:613.235.4902>

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd<http://twitter.com/davidmacd>

GitHub<https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com<http://www.can-adapt.com/>



  Adapting the web to all users
            Including those with disabilities

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>> wrote:
CfC’s need to be a yes/no answer please.

I’d hold off on the Understanding suggestion as it may be that we wind up with a single Understanding document that covers WCAG 2 (2.0 and 2.1).

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca<mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>>
Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 14:52
To: josh <josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>>
Cc: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com<mailto:jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 14:52

For 2.0, we can't change a word of the normative document... but we can add the exact same example into the 2.0 Understanding doc that will be in the 2.1 glossary.

So I propose a friendly amendment to have two changes.
1) Add the example to the 2.1 Glossary
2) Add the same example to the Understanding document for 2.0

Cheers,
David MacDonald



CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
Tel:  613.235.4902<tel:613.235.4902>

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd<http://twitter.com/davidmacd>

GitHub<https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com<http://www.can-adapt.com/>



  Adapting the web to all users
            Including those with disabilities

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:56 PM, josh <josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>> wrote:
Thanks Jon, yes. This is for 2.1.
Also people should feel free to review this issue for a little longer than the scheduled deadline and comment etc.

Thanks

Josh

InterAccess - Accessible UX

-------- Original message --------
From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com<mailto:jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>>
Date: 29/11/2016 18:14 (GMT+00:00)
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"


>  On todays call with the DPUB working group, the suggested example text was proposed to be added to the WCAG definition of a 'set of Webpages' in order to better address the needs of DPUB stakeholders.
Josh, to be clear, are we talking about this update for WCAG 2.1 or WCAG 2.0.  For WCAG 2.0 since the whole definition section is normative I don’t think we can it for 2.0 but for 2.1 it seems like it would be backwards compatible.

Jonathan

Jonathan Avila
Chief Accessibility Officer
SSB BART Group
jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com<mailto:jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
703.637.8957<tel:703.637.8957> (Office)

From:josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 12:47 PM
To: WCAG
Subject: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"

CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday Dec 1st at 5:00pm Boston time.

Hi all,

On todays call with the DPUB working group, the suggested example text was proposed to be added to the WCAG definition of a 'set of Webpages' in order to better address the needs of DPUB stakeholders.

The current definition can be seen here:
https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#set-of-web-pagesdef


DPUB Proposal for language: Example: A publication is split across multiple Web pages, where each page contains one chapter or other significant section of the work. The publication is logically a single contiguous unit, and contains navigation features that enable access to the full set of pages.

The item was discussed on the WG call and positive responses were proffered - (https://www.w3.org/2016/11/29-wai-wcag-minutes.html).

The original issue on Github: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/72


If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this position, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Thanks

Joshue O Connor | Director
InterAccess.ie - Accessible UX