Re: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"

For 2.0, we can't change a word of the normative document... but we can add
the exact same example into the 2.0 Understanding doc that will be in the
2.1 glossary.

So I propose a friendly amendment to have two changes.
1) Add the example to the 2.1 Glossary
2) Add the same example to the Understanding document for 2.0

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:56 PM, josh <josh@interaccess.ie> wrote:

> Thanks Jon, yes. This is for 2.1.
> Also people should feel free to review this issue for a little longer than
> the scheduled deadline and comment etc.
>
> Thanks
>
> Josh
>
> InterAccess - Accessible UX
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
> Date: 29/11/2016 18:14 (GMT+00:00)
> To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Subject: RE: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
>
> Ø  On todays call with the DPUB working group, the suggested example text
> was proposed to be added to the WCAG definition of a 'set of Webpages' in
> order to better address the needs of DPUB stakeholders.
>
> Josh, to be clear, are we talking about this update for WCAG 2.1 or WCAG
> 2.0.  For WCAG 2.0 since the whole definition section is normative I don’t
> think we can it for 2.0 but for 2.1 it seems like it would be backwards
> compatible.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> Jonathan Avila
>
> Chief Accessibility Officer
>
> SSB BART Group
>
> jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com
>
> 703.637.8957 (Office)
>
>
>
> *From:* josh@interaccess.ie [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2016 12:47 PM
> *To:* WCAG
> *Subject:* CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web
> pages"
>
>
>
> CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday Dec 1st at 5:00pm Boston time.
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> On todays call with the DPUB working group, the suggested example text was
> proposed to be added to the WCAG definition of a 'set of Webpages' in order
> to better address the needs of DPUB stakeholders.
>
> The current definition can be seen here:
> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#set-of-web-pagesdef
>
> DPUB Proposal for language: Example: A publication is split across
> multiple Web pages, where each page contains one chapter or other
> significant section of the work. The publication is logically a single
> contiguous unit, and contains navigation features that enable access to the
> full set of pages.
>
> The item was discussed on the WG call and positive responses were
> proffered - (https://www.w3.org/2016/11/29-wai-wcag-minutes.html).
>
> The original issue on Github: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/72
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this position, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Joshue O Connor | Director
>
> *InterAccess.ie - Accessible UX*
>