- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:33:40 -0500
- To: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bailey@access-board.gov>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDbuuF9mkjTsDYL6SZDPUMUDW8NW08q5-JeQkj1QE8O01A@mail.gmail.com>
>>The eight years from being chartered in 2000 to December 2008 when WCAG 2.0 was published was too long. Honestly, if we had published WCAG in 2006, or sooner I would be unemployed today and there would have been no uptake of WCAG... it simply was not ready (1200 comments on the 2006 draft). A look back at any of those published drafts will make it clear... or we may recall Joe Clark's famous article. http://alistapart.com/article/tohellwithwcag2 We went from there in 2006, to not one single formal objection in 2008, and one of the most successful standards in history. What a difference 2 years of hard work and humility makes. Anyway, we have a First Public Working draft of 2.1 due in 12-15 weeks. It will be our first major statement in 8 years... the world is watching.... are we ready? Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Bailey, Bruce <Bailey@access-board.gov> wrote: > I realize I am not responding to the most recent reply in this thread. > Andrews measured early response below sums it up for me. > > > > I am in favor of the proposed charter language as cited below. Two or > three years was the cycle as characterized to my Executive Director. We > need to push back on the 11 month expectation. > > > > As a thought exercise, imagine that 2.0 had a point iteration every year > since 2008. Do people think any one of those versions would have cited by > 508? The EU? ISO? At best, there would be three different requirements. > The deliberate care taken with 2.0 means that in 2017 we look to have a > single gold standard! Why settle for silver? > > > > I would prefer to see the energy people have for updated SC channeled into > more techniques. > > > > > > *From:* Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com] > *Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2016 3:26 PM > *To:* Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>; 'WCAG' < > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; josh@interaccess.ie > *Subject:* Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought > it was approx. 3 > > > > As of right now we say in the proposed charter "The Working Group intends > to produce updated guidance for accessibility on a regular interval of > approximately three years, starting with WCAG 2.1.” > > > > We may determine that we can do it in 2 or we may determine that we need > 4, or we may find that 2 is too soon or that 3 is too long. It is currently > TBD, as there is not a consensus opinion on the group for 2 years at this > point in time. > > > > Thanks, > > AWK > > > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > > Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility > > Adobe > > > > akirkpat@adobe.com > > http://twitter.com/awkawk > > > > *From: *Katie GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com> > *Date: *Monday, November 7, 2016 at 15:17 > *To: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, " > josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie> > *Subject: *Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it > was approx. 3 > > > > Andrew and Josh, > > > > I was at a presentation today put on by John Foliot, where he stated that > we, the WCAG Working Group, will be updating WCAG 2 every two years until > Silver comes out. > > > > Is there some background information about how often **we** plan on > updating WCAG 2, as was stated in the charter, that I am missing? > > > > ** katie ** > > > > > *Katie Haritos-Shea Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section > 508/ADA/AODA)* > > > > *Cell: 703-371-5545 <703-371-5545> **|**ryladog@gmail.com > <ryladog@gmail.com>**|**Oakton, VA **|**LinkedIn Profile > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/>**|**Office: 703-371-5545 > <703-371-5545> **|**@ryladog <https://twitter.com/Ryladog>* >
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2016 15:34:14 UTC