RE: Draft Silver Task Force work statement

This is a good draft Work Statement. My detailed comments are as follows.

Clarify the scope of the intended research to be undertaken by the Task Force (e.g., focused interviews, surveys and literature analysis to inform the development of requirements).

Should there be a dependency on the APA Working Group regarding engagement of the Research Questions Task Force on methodological issues and reviewing findings? At a minimum, APA review in regard to implications for upcoming W3C technologies would be valuable.
Editorial: there are several points in the document at which it still erroneously refers to the WCAG WG rather than to the AG (Accessibility Guidelines) WG.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Cooper [mailto:cooper@w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 10:57 AM
> To: WCAG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Subject: Draft Silver Task Force work statement
>
> Here is a draft work statement for the proposed Silver Task Force:
>
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/work-statement

>
> This is based on the draft sent to the mailing list with some staff contacty edits
> from me:
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2016OctDec/0119.html

>
> Michael
>


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________

Received on Thursday, 27 October 2016 15:23:21 UTC