W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review

From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 11:23:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJeQ8SDPPjwXQx_38PWngZFS+je0jYkjentXs_J85zU4ctB9Pg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I do not agree with the two year re lease plan. A two year review plan
is good, but two year seems arbitrary. SC's are interrelated it
doesn't make sense. it seems excessively burdensome.

I know what you are trying to do, but it is not there. There need to
be a way to balance shorter time to release and completing tasks.

Wayne

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
> This CFC received 18 affirmative votes and one outstanding objection. The
> chairs feel that the objection has been considered and was partly addressed
> by a compromise in draft charter language. Therefore, it is agreed as a
> decision (https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/decision-policy) of the WCAG Working
> Group to advance the draft charter for further review by W3M and the W3C AC,
> but we will record the objection along with the decision.
>
> The decision is recorded at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions. The
> one outstanding objection
> (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2016OctDec/0167.html) is
> recorded via reference to this email.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>
> From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
> Date: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 13:10
> To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Subject: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
> Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 13:10
>
> CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday October 13 at 1:00pm Boston time.
>
> This is a CfC seeking WG approval to release the current draft charter for
> AC review.  The item was surveyed, discussed on the WG call, and approved
> (http://www.w3.org/2016/10/11-wai-wcag-minutes.html). There was much
> discussion leading up to the call, and on the call, and the group felt that
> a consensus opinion was reached on key items.
>
> Draft charter: http://www.w3.org/2016/09/draft-wcag-charter
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being
> able to live with” this position, please let the group know before the CfC
> deadline.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
Received on Friday, 14 October 2016 18:25:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:06 UTC