- From: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:27:35 -0400
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <DC9F5AF4-F784-4217-856B-90F1E38B55BF@yahoo.com>
Great suggestion, David! And I would also suggest that conforming mobile apps do not need to link to their desktop counterparts and we should make that explicit. Mike > On Jun 28, 2016, at 8:41 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote: > > There are two parts of the definition for conforming alternative that could be used to ensure a mobile view is notleft inaccessible with the desktop view as the conforming alternative. > > "2. provides all of the same information and functionality in the same human language", > > A mobile view has different functionality (sort of) than a desktop view. > > "The conforming version can be reached from the non-conforming page via an accessibility-supported mechanism"" > > Many mobile pages load automatically and don't have a mechanism to switch to desktop view. > > But I don't think these parts of the definitions are strong enough to ensure the mobile view must be made to conform to WCAG. > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > CanAdapt Solutions Inc. > Tel: 613.235.4902 > LinkedIn > twitter.com/davidmacd > GitHub > www.Can-Adapt.com > > Adapting the web to all users > Including those with disabilities > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:32 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote: >> >> We currently have a bit of a hole in WCAG 2 that I think we should plug in 2.1. >> >> If a web page has a conforming alternative, then it doesn't need to conform itself. However, in the world of responsible design, it means if the desktop version conforms, the mobile version does not need to. I think we should plug this in WCAG 2.1. >> >> It might be as simple as adding a sentence to the definition of conforming alternative that large screen views of web pages do not qualify as a conforming alternative to small screen views. It will take some thought as to the exact wording and approach but it needs to be addressed I woulds say, otherwise organizations may just say they don't meed to make the mobile view accessible. >> >> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#conforming-alternate-versiondef >> >> Cheers, >> David MacDonald >> >> CanAdapt Solutions Inc. >> Tel: 613.235.4902 >> LinkedIn >> twitter.com/davidmacd >> GitHub >> www.Can-Adapt.com >> >> Adapting the web to all users >> Including those with disabilities >> >> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy >
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 13:28:16 UTC