- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:41:23 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
On 28/06/2016 14:27, Mike Elledge wrote: > Great suggestion, David! And I would also suggest that conforming mobile > apps do not need to link to their desktop counterparts and we should > make that explicit. If they're conforming, it wouldn't matter either way, as the developers likely don't see it as "since the mobile version is alternate to desktop, I need to add the link", since they're treating the mobile version as its own standalone version/thing. I don't therefore think it's necessary (but don't feel overly strongly about it if you feel an extra note / parenthetical sentence should be added to that definition) P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 13:51:30 UTC