- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:41:43 -0400
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP188DC956073358218575C45FE220@phx.gbl>
There are two parts of the definition for conforming alternative that could be used to ensure a mobile view is notleft inaccessible with the desktop view as the conforming alternative. " 2. provides all of the same information and functionality in the same human language " , A mobile view has different functionality (sort of) than a desktop view . "T he conforming version can be reached from the non-conforming page via an accessibility-supported mechanism "" Many mobile pages load automatically and don't have a mechanism to switch to desktop view. But I don't think these parts of the definitions are strong enough to ensure the mobile view must be made to conform to WCAG. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:32 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote: > > We currently have a bit of a hole in WCAG 2 that I think we should plug > in 2.1. > > If a web page has a conforming alternative, then it doesn't need to > conform itself. However, in the world of responsible design, it means if > the desktop version conforms, the mobile version does not need to. I think > we should plug this in WCAG 2.1. > > It might be as simple as adding a sentence to the definition of > conforming alternative that large screen views of web pages do not qualify > as a conforming alternative to small screen views. It will take some > thought as to the exact wording and approach but it needs to be addressed I > woulds say, otherwise organizations may just say they don't meed to make > the mobile view accessible. > > https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#conforming-alternate-versiondef > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > Tel: 613.235.4902 > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > * Including those with disabilities* > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> >
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 12:42:30 UTC