- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:41:43 -0400
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP188DC956073358218575C45FE220@phx.gbl>
There are two parts of the definition for conforming alternative that could
be used to ensure a mobile view is notleft inaccessible with the desktop
view as the conforming alternative.
"
2. provides all of the same information and functionality in the same human
language
"
,
A mobile view has different functionality (sort of) than a desktop view
.
"T
he conforming version can be reached from the non-conforming page via an
accessibility-supported mechanism
""
Many mobile pages load automatically and don't have a mechanism to switch
to desktop view.
But I don't think these parts of the definitions are strong enough to
ensure the mobile view must be made to conform to WCAG.
Cheers,
David MacDonald
*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel: 613.235.4902
LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
twitter.com/davidmacd
GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
* Adapting the web to all users*
* Including those with disabilities*
If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:32 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
>
> We currently have a bit of a hole in WCAG 2 that I think we should plug
> in 2.1.
>
> If a web page has a conforming alternative, then it doesn't need to
> conform itself. However, in the world of responsible design, it means if
> the desktop version conforms, the mobile version does not need to. I think
> we should plug this in WCAG 2.1.
>
> It might be as simple as adding a sentence to the definition of
> conforming alternative that large screen views of web pages do not qualify
> as a conforming alternative to small screen views. It will take some
> thought as to the exact wording and approach but it needs to be addressed I
> woulds say, otherwise organizations may just say they don't meed to make
> the mobile view accessible.
>
> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#conforming-alternate-versiondef
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel: 613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> * Adapting the web to all users*
> * Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 12:42:30 UTC