RE: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures

Sure.
I have no idea how many it is, they should have more than 100 by now, but 
here is a link where you can find the list:
https://w3-connections.ibm.com/wikis/home?lang=en-us#!/wiki/W981269660531_424e_b0f0_f6fce2b45536/page/IBM%20MobileFirst%20for%20iOS%20Apps


Tom

Tom Babinszki
IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center
E-mail: tbabins@us.ibm.com
Phone: (847) 917-2990




From:   ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com>
To:     Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "josh@interaccess.ie" 
<josh@interaccess.ie>
Cc:     WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Date:   05/17/2016 12:57 PM
Subject:        RE: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures



+1 Thank you.
 
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
 
From: Alastair Campbell
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 12:51 PM
To: ALAN SMITH; josh@interaccess.ie
Cc: WCAG
Subject: Re: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures
 
Hi Alan,
 
I think would be the date last-reviewed date, as in, the last time it was 
reviewed.
 
It would probably be something added as we go forward (per 
technique/failure), unless there’s an automated means of adding it.
 
-Alastair
 
 
From: ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 17:41
To: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures
Resent-From: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 17:42
 
Josh,
 
Would that be the “final” review or just any “reviewed” effort?
 
Alan
 
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
 
From: josh@interaccess.ie
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 12:40 PM
To: WCAG
Subject: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures
 
Hi all,
 
On the call today, it was suggested that this proposal to add a 'Date 
Approved' field to Techs and Failures
be tweaked to be 'Date reviewed'. [1]
 
How does the group feel about this? The consensus on the call was that it 
was a good idea, was relatively easy to
do technically and would help our users see that work is ongoing with our 
supporting materials.
 
Let us know what you think.
 
Thanks
 
Josh
 
[1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/183