- From: ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 12:55:06 -0400
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <573b4cdd.0f6c810a.7e6a4.ffff80ea@mx.google.com>
+1 Thank you. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Alastair Campbell Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 12:51 PM To: ALAN SMITH; josh@interaccess.ie Cc: WCAG Subject: Re: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures Hi Alan, I think would be the date last-reviewed date, as in, the last time it was reviewed. It would probably be something added as we go forward (per technique/failure), unless there’s an automated means of adding it. -Alastair From: ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 17:41 To: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: RE: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures Resent-From: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Resent-Date: Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 17:42 Josh, Would that be the “final” review or just any “reviewed” effort? Alan Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: josh@interaccess.ie Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 12:40 PM To: WCAG Subject: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures Hi all, On the call today, it was suggested that this proposal to add a 'Date Approved' field to Techs and Failures be tweaked to be 'Date reviewed'. [1] How does the group feel about this? The consensus on the call was that it was a good idea, was relatively easy to do technically and would help our users see that work is ongoing with our supporting materials. Let us know what you think. Thanks Josh [1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/183
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 16:55:21 UTC