RE: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures

+1, with the language Alastair mentioned in the meeting

(something like:
“Reviewed dates” were added as of [mm-dd-yyyy]. Anything without a reviewed date was reviewed or added prior to [mm-dd-yyyy].”

From: ALAN SMITH [mailto:alands289@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 11:55 AM
To: Alastair Campbell; josh@interaccess.ie
Cc: WCAG
Subject: RE: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures

+1 Thank you.

Sent from Mail<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__go.microsoft.com_fwlink_-3FLinkId-3D550986&d=CwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLm9hvvvzvGv0FLoWSRuCSs5Q&r=_REkUglEy1Mi-4wzMRNju7nrUQ4IPBJJ_zwWi5TiY20&m=D2sPcCW-QKZg-CIRsJa2dNP2LRFQ-lfKWpKeNyHBLoc&s=awz_0e0tFJE7Mop2ujho5PkxK66QouSJGmkWI3blIpk&e=> for Windows 10

From: Alastair Campbell<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 12:51 PM
To: ALAN SMITH<mailto:alands289@gmail.com>; josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>
Cc: WCAG<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures

Hi Alan,

I think would be the date last-reviewed date, as in, the last time it was reviewed.

It would probably be something added as we go forward (per technique/failure), unless there’s an automated means of adding it.

-Alastair


From: ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com<mailto:alands289@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 17:41
To: "josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>" <josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures
Resent-From: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 17:42

Josh,

Would that be the “final” review or just any “reviewed” effort?

Alan

Sent from Mail<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__go.microsoft.com_fwlink_-3FLinkId-3D550986&d=CwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLm9hvvvzvGv0FLoWSRuCSs5Q&r=_REkUglEy1Mi-4wzMRNju7nrUQ4IPBJJ_zwWi5TiY20&m=D2sPcCW-QKZg-CIRsJa2dNP2LRFQ-lfKWpKeNyHBLoc&s=awz_0e0tFJE7Mop2ujho5PkxK66QouSJGmkWI3blIpk&e=> for Windows 10

From: josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 12:40 PM
To: WCAG<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures

Hi all,

On the call today, it was suggested that this proposal to add a 'Date Approved' field to Techs and Failures
be tweaked to be 'Date reviewed'. [1]

How does the group feel about this? The consensus on the call was that it was a good idea, was relatively easy to
do technically and would help our users see that work is ongoing with our supporting materials.

Let us know what you think.

Thanks

Josh

[1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/183<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_w3c_wcag_issues_183&d=CwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLm9hvvvzvGv0FLoWSRuCSs5Q&r=_REkUglEy1Mi-4wzMRNju7nrUQ4IPBJJ_zwWi5TiY20&m=D2sPcCW-QKZg-CIRsJa2dNP2LRFQ-lfKWpKeNyHBLoc&s=2xxouatUFx6alcuTSmXXYlWGHQiTgWELi79gFviW0So&e=>

Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 18:00:06 UTC