- From: <kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 17:53:34 +0000
- To: <alands289@gmail.com>, <acampbell@nomensa.com>, <josh@interaccess.ie>
- CC: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <ED79D68BE083CB43A321BCE2A684021CDA60D895@C111WHRPMBX28.ERF.thomson.com>
+1, with the language Alastair mentioned in the meeting (something like: “Reviewed dates” were added as of [mm-dd-yyyy]. Anything without a reviewed date was reviewed or added prior to [mm-dd-yyyy].” From: ALAN SMITH [mailto:alands289@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 11:55 AM To: Alastair Campbell; josh@interaccess.ie Cc: WCAG Subject: RE: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures +1 Thank you. Sent from Mail<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__go.microsoft.com_fwlink_-3FLinkId-3D550986&d=CwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLm9hvvvzvGv0FLoWSRuCSs5Q&r=_REkUglEy1Mi-4wzMRNju7nrUQ4IPBJJ_zwWi5TiY20&m=D2sPcCW-QKZg-CIRsJa2dNP2LRFQ-lfKWpKeNyHBLoc&s=awz_0e0tFJE7Mop2ujho5PkxK66QouSJGmkWI3blIpk&e=> for Windows 10 From: Alastair Campbell<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 12:51 PM To: ALAN SMITH<mailto:alands289@gmail.com>; josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> Cc: WCAG<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: Re: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures Hi Alan, I think would be the date last-reviewed date, as in, the last time it was reviewed. It would probably be something added as we go forward (per technique/failure), unless there’s an automated means of adding it. -Alastair From: ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com<mailto:alands289@gmail.com>> Date: Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 17:41 To: "josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>" <josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>> Subject: RE: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures Resent-From: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 17:42 Josh, Would that be the “final” review or just any “reviewed” effort? Alan Sent from Mail<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__go.microsoft.com_fwlink_-3FLinkId-3D550986&d=CwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLm9hvvvzvGv0FLoWSRuCSs5Q&r=_REkUglEy1Mi-4wzMRNju7nrUQ4IPBJJ_zwWi5TiY20&m=D2sPcCW-QKZg-CIRsJa2dNP2LRFQ-lfKWpKeNyHBLoc&s=awz_0e0tFJE7Mop2ujho5PkxK66QouSJGmkWI3blIpk&e=> for Windows 10 From: josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 12:40 PM To: WCAG<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures Hi all, On the call today, it was suggested that this proposal to add a 'Date Approved' field to Techs and Failures be tweaked to be 'Date reviewed'. [1] How does the group feel about this? The consensus on the call was that it was a good idea, was relatively easy to do technically and would help our users see that work is ongoing with our supporting materials. Let us know what you think. Thanks Josh [1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/183<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_w3c_wcag_issues_183&d=CwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLm9hvvvzvGv0FLoWSRuCSs5Q&r=_REkUglEy1Mi-4wzMRNju7nrUQ4IPBJJ_zwWi5TiY20&m=D2sPcCW-QKZg-CIRsJa2dNP2LRFQ-lfKWpKeNyHBLoc&s=2xxouatUFx6alcuTSmXXYlWGHQiTgWELi79gFviW0So&e=>
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 18:00:06 UTC