Re[4]: Difference between SC 1.3.1 and SC 2.4.6?

Josh wrote:
 > Again, to me it seems these items can be dovetailed.
 >
 >I think you’d be pulling at the thread of the “POUR” structure, one is 
structure based the other is content based.  If you combine or 
categorise >those together, wouldn't you be re-structuring to a more 
functionality based approach? E.g. Put all the forms stuff together?

Interesting. Maybe.

------ Original Message ------
From: "Alastair Campbell" <acampbell@nomensa.com>
To: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>
Cc: "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: 10/05/2016 14:49:36
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Difference between SC 1.3.1 and SC 2.4.6?

>Patrick wrote:
>>1.3.1 is about making sure relationships are not simply conveyed 
>>visually, through styling, so the structure/relationship can be 
>>programmatically determined by, say, AT, and presented to users in 
>>different ways beyond just visual style.
>>
>>2.4.6 on the other hand is about making sure that users (sighted, 
>>non-sighted, etc) can actually understand content properly. It's not 
>>about how these headings/labels are coded (like "use proper <h1>-<h6> 
>>", as that falls under 1.3.1).
>Josh wrote:
> > Again, to me it seems these items can be dovetailed.
>
>I think you’d be pulling at the thread of the “POUR” structure, one is 
>structure based the other is content based.  If you combine or 
>categorise those together, wouldn't you be re-structuring to a more 
>functionality based approach? E.g. Put all the forms stuff together?
>
>-Alastair