if the content changes enough — it becomes a change of context - per the definition. we thought about defining it quantitatively and decided it was dependent on what content and where (e.g. if content was below where the user currently was or not) etc. gregg > On May 6, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > > On 06/05/2016 17:47, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: >> In my scenarios there would not be a change if context, just a change of content. > > Actually, apologies. It seems that it's been a while since I saw the normative definition of "change of context". I can see how at least part of the situation I mention (e.g. the portrait/landscape flip and related change of overall structure, and perhaps the overall search results/items being listed) could arguably be classed as changes of context (examples 2 - viewport and 4 - content, respectively) https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#context-changedef > > Changing from portrait to landscape though isn't really a focus (3.2.1) change, and probably stretching the definition of being an "input" (3.2.2). > > It also doesn't necessarily cover changes in content that happen automatically (unrelated to a focus or input action) but that nonetheless should be conveyed to users. > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke >
Received on Friday, 6 May 2016 17:04:59 UTC