Re: New SC relating to notifications of content change (was Re: Some thinking around the orientation discussion)

On 06/05/2016 17:47, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> In my scenarios there would not be a change if context, just a change of content.

Actually, apologies. It seems that it's been a while since I saw the 
normative definition of "change of context". I can see how at least part 
of the situation I mention (e.g. the portrait/landscape flip and related 
change of overall structure, and perhaps the overall search 
results/items being listed) could arguably be classed as changes of 
context (examples 2 - viewport and 4 - content, respectively) 
https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#context-changedef

Changing from portrait to landscape though isn't really a focus (3.2.1) 
change, and probably stretching the definition of being an "input" (3.2.2).

It also doesn't necessarily cover changes in content that happen 
automatically (unrelated to a focus or input action) but that 
nonetheless should be conveyed to users.

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Friday, 6 May 2016 16:54:48 UTC