- From: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 12:35:45 -0400
- To: "'Patrick H. Lauke'" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>, "'GLWAI Guidelines WG org'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: "'lisa.seeman'" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, <ryladog@gmail.com>
I think this relates to both these SC as well........... 3.2.1 On Focus: When any component receives focus, it does not initiate a change of context. (Level A) 3.2.2 On Input: Changing the setting of any user interface component does not automatically cause a change of context unless the user has been advised of the behavior before using the component. (Level A) * katie * Katie Haritos-Shea Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA) Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 -----Original Message----- From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 11:20 AM To: public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org; GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Cc: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> Subject: Re: New SC relating to notifications of content change (was Re: Some thinking around the orientation discussion) On 06/05/2016 15:56, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > > I think this is essential - but I think it is already covered. Where? Under which SC would this fall? To clarify, this is not (I think) 4.1.2 as that SC relates to updating/notifying user of change to interactive elements/controls (so that if their status changes, or their actual function/label, that this is done in a way that then conveys the change programmatically to users), not about changes in the overall document/structure/content elsewhere on the page. > If not - then it would need to be clarified in connection with > conformance rather than as another SC. > If this isn’t obvious/clear already (and evidently it isnt) then I > THINK it could be clarified in Understanding WCAG 2.0 — and be done > immediately with the next publication of that document. > > I and Loretta and David and others can confirm that it was the > intent and understanding of the group that if it changed - it should > remain accessible. > > > does this help? > > > > /gregg/ -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Friday, 6 May 2016 16:44:18 UTC