Re: CfC: Publish WCAG 2.0 Edited Version with editorial errata only

+1 to publish.

Kindest Regards,
Laura

On 5/6/16, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
> CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Tuesday May 10 at 11:20am Boston time.
>
> The Working Group is chartered to publish an edited version of the WCAG 2.0
> document that incorporates editorial errata.
>
> The Working Group agreed on the call on Tuesday to approve the publication
> of the edited version:
> http://www.w3.org/2016/05/03-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item01. The group had a
> survey and was able to address all concerns:
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/NewWCAGfinalEdit/results.
>
> This publication is not making substantive changes to WCAG 2.0, only
> correcting editorial issues.  The errata are identified here:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/.
>
> The diff-marked version of the document is located here: new WCAG edited
> recommendation<https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2016/WD-WCAG20-20160419/Overview-diff.html>
> – the easiest way to view the individual edits is to search for “begin
> change”.
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being
> able to live with” this position, please let the group know before the CfC
> deadline.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility and Standards
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>


-- 
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Friday, 6 May 2016 16:29:28 UTC