- From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:36:17 +0200
- To: james.nurthen@oracle.com
- Cc: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I don"t quite see the point in removing the reference to 3.3.2 (labels or instructions) in H65 because that is exactly the Success Criterion that the technique relates to. The critical bit is the qualification in H65 "when the label element cannot be used". On longer forms (as pointed out by Paul) it is perfectly possible to use visible labels, so H65 does not qualify. Still, there are contexts where H65 will meet SC 3.3.2 so the reference should stay in place. Detlev On 12 Jun 2015, at 06:03, james.nurthen@oracle.com wrote: > I agree. h65 is valid but doesn't let you meet 3.3.2 by itself. > > On Jun 11, 2015, at 8:04 PM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> wrote: > >> We need to consider removing the reference to SC 3.3.2 from H65. >> >> See this article >> http://pauljadam.com/demos/wcagh65invalid.html >> >> H65 >> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/H65.html >> >> Jonathan >> >> -- >> Jonathan Avila >> Chief Accessibility Officer >> SSB BART Group >> jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com >> >> 703-637-8957 (o) >> Follow us: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Blog | Newsletter >> -- Detlev Fischer testkreis - das Accessibility-Team von feld.wald.wiese c/o feld.wald.wiese Thedestraße 2 22767 Hamburg Tel +49 (0)40 439 10 68-3 Mobil +49 (0)1577 170 73 84 Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5 http://www.testkreis.de Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites
Received on Friday, 12 June 2015 07:36:45 UTC