Re: H65 updates

I agree. h65 is valid but doesn't let you meet 3.3.2 by itself.  

> On Jun 11, 2015, at 8:04 PM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> wrote:
> 
> We need to consider removing the reference to SC 3.3.2 from H65.
>  
> See this article
> http://pauljadam.com/demos/wcagh65invalid.html
>  
> H65
> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/H65.html
>  
> Jonathan
>  
> -- 
> Jonathan Avila
> Chief Accessibility Officer
> SSB BART Group 
> jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com
>  
> 703-637-8957 (o) 
> Follow us: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Blog | Newsletter
>