- From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:48:46 +0000
- To: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- CC: Sailesh Panchang <spanchang02@yahoo.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Sailesh, > Hello Joshue, >>> I think Kathys comment is a fair observation, unless it is a common pattern. Maybe>>we need a third example which uses the neutral<div> elements also. This would also>>help to highlight the use of the ARIA grouping roles without any potential confusion>>over whether 'this element is valid on a table or not'. > I do not see where you see potential confusion. [...] It's more where there is potential to enhance it in others that I'm mindful of. > The technique that was > first submitted correctly reflected this in its title: > "Marking logical group of fields using role=group / role=radiogroup > when using fieldset-legend is not practical" > Maybe that should be reinstated? Thanks for that - not a bad idea. > Sure one can use role=group/radiogroup if one codes custom form > controls that cannot be labeled without ARIA or grouped with > fieldset-legend are still in a table-less container. Perhaps someone > might take an action item to create 'Example 3' for that situation. Ok, we can discuss this on the call on Tues. Josh
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 14:49:16 UTC