Re: Review points for Understanding and Techniques

Thanks for the reviews so far. To reduce list traffic I will list the
disposition of them below by reference to the list archive. Apologies
that this means you have to follow a link to get context of my response.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2010JulSep/0065.html
    This comment is beyond the scope of the pre-publication review. It
    needs to be processed formally and cannot be addressed for this
    publication.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2010JulSep/0067.html
    Same as above, out of scope.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2010JulSep/0069.html
    I can't find the problem mentioned. It may already have been fixed.
    Please be sure you were reviewing the URLs I sent, not an older
    version of the document.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2010JulSep/0071.html
    Apparently I had a bunch of the Flash examples pointing to .fla
    files instead of .swf files - a copy / paste error. These should be
    fixed. I also fixed the expected results for FLASH15.

Michael

Michael Cooper wrote:
> The Understanding and Techniques documents have all the edits in place
> that are on my radar. I would like for us to approve publication this
> week, so you should review these documents before Thursday.
>
> Once again, the URLs are:
>
>     * http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20100923/
>     * http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/
>
> You can look at anything you like for your review, but here are a few
> points I'd particularly like the group's attention on:
>
>     * Technique F39
>       <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/F39> was
>       substantially updated.
>     * Technique H93
>       <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/H93> is new.
>     * Technique H94
>       <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/H94> is new.
>     * Technique FLASH37 removed and content merged into FLASH15
>       <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/FLASH15>.
>     * I've added styling to example images in techniques, so they are
>       now centered and have an "outset" border. The technique that
>       triggered this was G175
>       <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/G175>
>       though it affects around 15 or 20 techniques. I'm no designer so
>       want to know if this looks ok as I implemented, or concrete
>       suggestions otherwise.
>     * In the first paragraph of the intro to sufficient and advisory
>       techniques
>       <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20100923/intro.html#introduction-layers-techs-head>
>       I added excerpts from the Understanding, but without the links
>       you would expect because they were examples, not content people
>       should necessarily follow in that context. Want to make sure
>       that's ok and that the paragraph reads ok. This was for issue
>       2834 <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=2834>.
>     * Edited description for G164
>       <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/G164>
>       but wasn't sure if that was the intended edit for issue 2711
>       <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=2711>.
>     * I previously sent a question about a random todo
>       <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2010JulSep/0060.html>
>       from Ben.
>     * I previously sent a question that I don't know what the intended
>       edit is
>       <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2010JulSep/0061.html>
>       for issue 2761.
>
> The recent changes are mostly reflected in the issues found at the
> following query URL:
>
> http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/buglist.cgi?chfieldto=2010-09-27&chfieldfrom=2010-09-20
>
> You can look through those bugs if you want to check my work more
> thoroughly. Also, the diff markup in the documents includes all
> changes (except super-minor editorial things like typo fixes) made in
> the last year and a half.
>
> If you have edits that need to be made, please send them my way ASAP,
> I can't receive a whole bunch of edits late and be able to publish in
> a timely manner. Also for this review, changes should focus on
> perfecting edits that we already have committed to do, largely in
> response to public comments we've processed. New improvements, please
> hold off, we can process them after we get this next public version
> posted.
>
> Michael
> -- 
>
> Michael Cooper
> Web Accessibility Specialist
> World Wide Web Consortium, Web Accessibility Initiative
> E-mail cooper@w3.org <mailto:cooper@w3.org>
> Information Page <http://www.w3.org/People/cooper/>
>

-- 

Michael Cooper
Web Accessibility Specialist
World Wide Web Consortium, Web Accessibility Initiative
E-mail cooper@w3.org <mailto:cooper@w3.org>
Information Page <http://www.w3.org/People/cooper/>